Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submitting-patches: Document RESEND tag on patches

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submitting-patches: Document RESEND tag on patches
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:31:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <452a0c53-8dae-870b-fd7b-807ade28701c@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zgw98blq.fsf@meer.lwn.net>

On 6/1/21 3:27 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> writes:
> 
>> Wow, time flies. :-\
>>
>> A month and a half later, Jon, how about it?
> 
> Oops...somehow I missed the fact that there was something there for me
> to look at and respond to, sorry.
> 
> I've just read it through...  if it were me, I would find a way to
> reduce its bulk in the hope that people would actually read it; much of
> what's there is in coding-style.rst (or should be).  But it's not me,
> and if you want to keep it I won't whine (much).  Except about reverse
> fir tree, perhaps, but nobody listens to me on that...:)  I'd say
> package it up as a maintainer-guide entry and go for it.

Yes, as a maintainer-profile/guide/whatever, please,
for X86/tip.

Same for several other feedback comments on patches that
are destined for the tip tree.

thanks.
-- 
~Randy