All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] hw/i386: Introduce init_topo_info to initialize X86CPUTopoInfo
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:54:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47d531cb-1f52-f9b4-dcf2-24f119baadff@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224091833.2d3dec7f@redhat.com>



On 2/24/20 2:18 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:51:15 -0600
> Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2/21/20 11:05 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:16:51 -0600
>>> Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Initialize all the parameters in one function init_topo_info.  
>>>
>>> is it possible to squash it in 2/16
>>>   
>> Sure. We can do that.
>>>   
>>>>
>>>> Move the data structure X86CPUTopoIDs and X86CPUTopoInfo into
>>>> x86.h.  
>>> A reason why it's moved should be here.  
>>
>> Apicid functions will be part of X86MachineState data structure(patches
>> introduced later).These functions will use X86CPUTopoIDs and
>> X86CPUTopoInfo definition. Will add these details. Thanks
> 
> why not just include topology.h into the X86MachineState header,
> and keep topo structures/functions where they are now?
> (I dislike a little scattering consolidated pieces across multiple files,
> but what worries me more is that it makes target/i386/cpu.c via
> topology.h -> x86.h chain pull in a lot of unrelated dependencies)
> 
> So I'd keep X86CPUTopoIDs and X86CPUTopoInfo in topology.h 

Ok. Sure. we can do that.

> 
> [...]
>>>> +static inline void init_topo_info(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
>>>> +                                  const X86MachineState *x86ms)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(x86ms);
>>>> +
>>>> +    topo_info->dies_per_pkg = x86ms->smp_dies;
>>>> +    topo_info->cores_per_die = ms->smp.cores;
>>>> +    topo_info->threads_per_core = ms->smp.threads;
>>>> +}
> 
> this is pure machine specific helper, and aren't used anywhere else
> beside machine code.
> Suggest to put it in pc.c or x86.c to keep topology.h machine independent.

Ok. Will do.

> 
>>>>  
>>>>  /* Return the bit width needed for 'count' IDs
>>>>   */
>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/x86.h b/include/hw/i386/x86.h
>>>> index 4b84917885..ad62b01cf2 100644
>>>> --- a/include/hw/i386/x86.h
>>>> +++ b/include/hw/i386/x86.h
>>>> @@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ typedef struct {
>>>>      bool compat_apic_id_mode;
>>>>  } X86MachineClass;
>>>>  
>>>> +/* APIC IDs can be 32-bit, but beware: APIC IDs > 255 require x2APIC support
>>>> + */
>>>> +typedef uint32_t apic_id_t;
>>>> +
>>>> +typedef struct X86CPUTopoIDs {
>>>> +    unsigned pkg_id;
>>>> +    unsigned die_id;
>>>> +    unsigned core_id;
>>>> +    unsigned smt_id;
>>>> +} X86CPUTopoIDs;
>>>> +
>>>> +typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
>>>> +    unsigned dies_per_pkg;
>>>> +    unsigned cores_per_die;
>>>> +    unsigned threads_per_core;
>>>> +} X86CPUTopoInfo;
>>>> +
>>>>  typedef struct {
>>>>      /*< private >*/
>>>>      MachineState parent;
>>>>  
>>>   
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-24 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-13 18:16 [PATCH v4 00/16] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU model Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] hw/i386: Rename X86CPUTopoInfo structure to X86CPUTopoIDs Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] hw/i386: Introduce X86CPUTopoInfo to contain topology info Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] hw/i386: Consolidate topology functions Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] hw/i386: Introduce init_topo_info to initialize X86CPUTopoInfo Babu Moger
2020-02-21 17:05   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-21 17:51     ` Babu Moger
2020-02-24  8:18       ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 16:54         ` Babu Moger [this message]
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] machine: Add SMP Sockets in CpuTopology Babu Moger
2020-02-24  8:37   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] hw/i386: Update structures for nodes_per_pkg Babu Moger
2020-02-24  8:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:12     ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25  7:42       ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] hw/i386: Rename apicid_from_topo_ids to x86_apicid_from_topo_ids Babu Moger
2020-02-20 12:43   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding functions Babu Moger
2020-02-24  8:50   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:24     ` Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] target/i386: Cleanup and use the EPYC mode topology functions Babu Moger
2020-02-24  8:52   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:29     ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25  7:49       ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-25 15:10         ` Babu Moger
2020-03-02 17:09         ` Babu Moger
2020-03-03  8:47           ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] hw/i386: Introduce apicid functions inside X86MachineState Babu Moger
2020-02-24 17:01   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:30     ` Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] target/i386: Load apicid model specific handlers from X86CPUDefinition Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] hw/i386: Use the apicid handlers from X86MachineState Babu Moger
2020-02-24 17:19   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:58     ` Babu Moger
2020-02-24 22:31       ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-02-24 23:13         ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25 15:32           ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-02-25 15:41             ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25  8:16         ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-25 15:26           ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] target/i386: Add EPYC model specific handlers Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] hw/i386: Move arch_id decode inside x86_cpus_init Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] i386: Fix pkg_id offset for EPYC cpu models Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] tests: Update the Unit tests Babu Moger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47d531cb-1f52-f9b4-dcf2-24f119baadff@amd.com \
    --to=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.