All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:57:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49EDECE5.2090406@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421105629.GB17904@jurassic.park.msu.ru>

Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:09:32PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> also it seems logical is wrong.
>>
>> we should make sure if one pci resource support 64 from pci_read_bases() instead of 
>> pcibios_allocate_resources.
> 
> pci_read_bases() is already providing all necessary information.

current pci_read_bases() does not tell us if that device support 32bit pref mem or 64bit pref.
aka there is type about that, but that is not recording in res->flag

> 
>> thinking about: if pci bridge on bus 0 (aka first peer root bus), some device under
>> bridge doesn't get allocated resource from BIOS. and those bridge/device does support pref mem64
>> then your patch will not getIORESORCE_MEM64 set before pcibios_pci64_verify...
> 
> Yes, that's my point - even if host bridge, p2p bridge and device are 64-bit,
> there is absolutely no guarantee that after moving the BARs above 4G
> the device will work correctly.
> 
>> Correct logic should be
>> record all device if support 64bit pref mem (with pci_read_bases), and make sure bridge to be
>>  consistent with that of device under if.
> 
> Your view is very x86 centric, please don't forget that drivers/pci
> code is used by other architectures as well:
> - limiting 32-bit allocations to 0xffffffff simply breaks non-x86
>   architectures. Alpha doesn't even boot with your patch;

will look at it, may limit that to x86 arch.

> - there are lots of devices with 64-bit non-prefetchable memory BARs,
>   you don't seem to care about that.

the fact is current p2p spec said: mem ( non pref) is 32bit.
and pref mem could be 64bit or 32 bit.

with devices on root buses directly, we may need to expand current 
res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH checking to support it.

> 
> And your patch doesn't work even on x86:
> 
> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL PCI Express Root Port (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>         Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx+
>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 16 bytes
>         Bus: primary=00, secondary=04, subordinate=04, sec-latency=0
>         I/O behind bridge: 0000e000-0000efff
>         Memory behind bridge: cdf00000-cfffffff
>         Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000d0000000-00000000dfffffff
>         Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
>         BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA+ MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
>                 PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
>         Capabilities: [88] Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 0000
>         Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
>                 Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>         Capabilities: [90] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+
>                 Address: fee0300c  Data: 4159
>         Capabilities: [a0] Express (v1) Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
>                 DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us
>                         ExtTag- RBE- FLReset-
>                 DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
>                         RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
>                         MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
>                 DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
>                 LnkCap: Port #2, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <256ns, L1 <4us
>                         ClockPM- Suprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
>                 LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
>                         ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
>                 LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
>                 SltCap: AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug- Surpise-
>                         Slot #  0, PowerLimit 75.000000; Interlock- NoCompl-
>                 SltCtl: Enable: AttnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq- LinkChg-
>                         Control: AttnInd Off, PwrInd On, Power- Interlock-
>                 SltSta: Status: AttnBtn- PowerFlt- MRL- CmdCplt- PresDet+ Interlock-
>                         Changed: MRL- PresDet+ LinkState-
>                 RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-
>                 RootCap: CRSVisible-
>                 RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
> 00: 86 80 71 27 07 05 10 00 02 00 04 06 04 00 01 00
> 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 04 00 e0 e0 00 00
> 20: f0 cd f0 cf 01 d0 f1 df 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 30: 00 00 00 00 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 0a 00
> 
> As one can see, the prefetchable base register (0x24) is 0xd001, the
> bit 0 indicates 64-bitness. Which is not true, as i82945G/GZ/P/PL
> only supports 32-bit addressing (please check the datasheet).

that should be done with quirks way to handle it.

> 
> Also, your patch can't handle transparent bridges. And it doesn't
> bode well for bus sizing code.

my patch is only trying to handle the case:
don't assume all pref mem is 64bit so don't assign resource above to 4g to pci bridge that
has device under it but the device only support 32 bit pref.

for the bus resize, may could be use your mem64 res, but set that flag always, 
and in pci_bus_size_bridges, try to  expand 
                mask = IORESOURCE_MEM;
                prefmask = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
                if (pbus_size_mem(bus, prefmask, prefmask))
                        mask = prefmask; /* Success, size non-prefetch only. */
                pbus_size_mem(bus, mask, IORESOURCE_MEM);

to have more tries, and that flags.

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-21 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-11103-13546@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <200904101913.n3AJDhMm018684@demeter.kernel.org>
2009-04-10 20:27   ` [Bug 11103] Can't use framebuffer or vesa Xorg with two memory modules Yinghai Lu
2009-04-11  3:29     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-14 20:49       ` [PATCH] pci: don't assume pref memio are 64bit -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-14 20:50         ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only Yinghai Lu
2009-04-14 21:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-14 21:27             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-14 21:27             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-14 22:35             ` Yannick Roehlly
2009-04-15  0:29             ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-15  0:41               ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v3 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-15  0:42                 ` [PATCH] x86/pci: fix -1 calling to e820_all_mapped with mmconfig Yinghai Lu
2009-04-16 16:31                 ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v3 Jesse Barnes
2009-04-16 16:44                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 16:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 17:18                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-16 17:27                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-16 17:38                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 17:28                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 20:13                           ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-16 23:18                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 23:54                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-17  0:24                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-17 13:16                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-17 21:59                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-17 22:04                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-18  5:37                                       ` [PATCH] pci: keep pci device resource name pointer right Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18  7:51                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-18 16:05                                           ` Jesse Barnes
2009-04-18 18:42                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-18 19:19                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 19:23                                             ` Greg KH
2009-04-18 20:00                                               ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-18 20:27                                                 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-18 20:37                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-18 22:05                                                     ` [PATCH] driver: dont update dev_name via device_add path Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28  7:36                                                       ` [PATCH] driver: make dev_set_name(, NULL) work Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28  7:42                                                         ` [RFC PATCH] use dev_set_name(,NULL) to prevent leaking Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28  8:25                                                           ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 15:21                                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 15:34                                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 15:39                                                                 ` Greg KH
2009-04-28 15:51                                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 15:56                                                                     ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 16:08                                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 16:15                                                                         ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 19:04                                                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 16:36                                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 16:50                                                                         ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 14:52                                                           ` Greg KH
2009-04-28 14:51                                                         ` [PATCH] driver: make dev_set_name(, NULL) work Greg KH
2009-04-28 15:14                                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-28 15:39                                                             ` Greg KH
2009-04-18 21:07                                                   ` [PATCH] pci: keep pci device resource name pointer right Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 22:17                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-18 20:00                                               ` [PATCH] driver: dont update dev_name if it is not changed Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 20:11                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-18 20:20                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 20:27                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-18  8:33                               ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18  9:22                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-18 17:07                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 18:57                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-18 19:14                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-18 19:26                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 22:20                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 22:31                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-18 20:13                                       ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-18 18:50                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-18 22:44                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 23:01                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 23:06                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-18 23:26                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 23:30                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-18 23:04                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-19  0:32                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-19  4:50                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-19  5:26                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-19 19:35                                           ` Yannick Roehlly
2009-04-19 19:59                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-19 20:24                                               ` Yannick Roehlly
2009-04-19  9:02                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-19  9:06                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-19 17:52                                             ` Jesse Barnes
2009-04-20 22:33                                             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-20 22:52                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-21 10:54                                                 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-21  0:09                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-21 10:56                                                 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-21 15:57                                                   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-04-22 22:37                                                   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] pci: don't assume pref memio are 64bit -v3 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-22 22:38                                                     ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] pci: try to assign res for device under transparent bridges Yinghai Lu
2009-04-22 22:49                                                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] pci: don't assume pref memio are 64bit -v3 Jesse Barnes
2009-04-23  0:49                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-23  1:05                                                         ` Jesse Barnes
2009-04-23  2:03                                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-23 12:58                                                             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-23 15:30                                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-23  2:10                                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-23 13:22                                                             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-23 15:13                                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-23 22:19                                                                 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-24  3:48                                                                   ` [PATCH 1/4] pci/x86: don't assume pref memio are 64bit -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-24  3:49                                                                     ` [PATCH 2/4] pci: try to assign res for device under transparent bridges -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-24  3:50                                                                     ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: reserve range near the ram Yinghai Lu
2009-04-24  3:50                                                                     ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v5 Yinghai Lu
2009-04-24 13:16                                                                     ` [PATCH 1/4] pci/x86: don't assume pref memio are 64bit -v4 Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-05-05 18:52                                                                     ` Jesse Barnes
2009-05-06 12:33                                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 15:06                                                                         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: reserve range near the ram Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11  9:51                                                                           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, e820, pci: reserve extra free space near end of RAM tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2009-05-06 15:07                                                                         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v5 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11  9:51                                                                           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/pci: remove rounding quirk from e820_setup_gap() tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-04-23 12:36                                                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] pci: don't assume pref memio are 64bit -v3 Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-23 12:41                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-23 13:09                                                         ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2009-04-23 15:05                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-21 15:41                                               ` [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4 Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49EDECE5.2090406@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yannick.roehlly@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.