All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] blktrace: refcount the request_queue during ioctl
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:45:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bfcbe0-2630-5c82-f305-fcee489ac9ea@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415061649.GS11244@42.do-not-panic.com>

On 2020-04-14 23:16, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 08:40:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hmm, where exactly does the race come in so that it can only happen
>> after where you take the reference, but not before it?  I'm probably
>> missing something, but that just means it needs to be explained a little
>> better :)
> 
>>From the trace on patch 2/5:
> 
>     BLKTRACE_SETUP(loop0) #2
>     [   13.933961] == blk_trace_ioctl(2, BLKTRACESETUP) start
>     [   13.936758] === do_blk_trace_setup(2) start
>     [   13.938944] === do_blk_trace_setup(2) creating directory
>     [   13.941029] === do_blk_trace_setup(2) using what debugfs_lookup() gave
>     
>     ---> From LOOP_CTL_DEL(loop0) #2
>     [   13.971046] === blk_trace_cleanup(7) end
>     [   13.973175] == __blk_trace_remove(7) end
>     [   13.975352] == blk_trace_shutdown(7) end
>     [   13.977415] = __blk_release_queue(7) calling blk_mq_debugfs_unregister()
>     [   13.980645] ==== blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(7) begin
>     [   13.980696] ==== blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(7) debugfs_remove_recursive(q->debugfs_dir)
>     [   13.983118] ==== blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(7) end q->debugfs_dir is NULL
>     [   13.986945] = __blk_release_queue(7) blk_mq_debugfs_unregister() end
>     [   13.993155] = __blk_release_queue(7) end
>     
>     ---> From BLKTRACE_SETUP(loop0) #2
>     [   13.995928] === do_blk_trace_setup(2) end with ret: 0
>     [   13.997623] == blk_trace_ioctl(2, BLKTRACESETUP) end
> 
> The BLKTRACESETUP above works on request_queue which later
> LOOP_CTL_DEL races on and sweeps the debugfs dir underneath us.
> If you use this commit alone though, this doesn't fix the race issue
> however, and that's because of both still the debugfs_lookup() use
> and that we're still using asynchronous removal at this point.
> 
> refcounting will just ensure we don't take the request_queue underneath
> our noses.

I think the above trace reveals a bug in the loop driver. The loop
driver shouldn't allow the associated request queue to disappear while
the loop device is open. One may want to have a look at sd_open() in the
sd driver. The scsi_disk_get() call in that function not only increases
the reference count of the SCSI disk but also of the underlying SCSI device.

Thanks,

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-15 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14  4:18 [PATCH 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14  4:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14  7:35   ` Greg KH
2020-04-15  2:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-14  4:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14  7:37   ` Greg KH
2020-04-14 15:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15  2:46   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-15 17:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-04-15 21:48     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16  0:56     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  1:02       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-04-16  1:20         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  2:10   ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16  5:25     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  5:47       ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16  6:09         ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16  6:22           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  6:20         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  6:28           ` Ming Lei
2020-04-17  4:09             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-17  4:09               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14  4:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] blktrace: refcount the request_queue during ioctl Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 15:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15  6:16     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15  7:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 12:34         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 12:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 13:25             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 14:18           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16  1:12             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  3:43               ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16  5:29                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 14:45       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-04-16  1:17         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  2:31   ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16  5:36     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14  4:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/swapfile: refcount block and queue before using blkcg_schedule_throttle() Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 15:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15  5:42     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15  7:27       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15  7:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 13:19           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  6:10             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16  6:22   ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16  6:25     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  6:34       ` Ming Lei
2020-04-14  4:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 15:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 20:58     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15  6:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 13:20         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16  2:36   ` Ming Lei
2020-04-14  7:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49bfcbe0-2630-5c82-f305-fcee489ac9ea@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.