From: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, iisaman@netapp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] CLNT: try to destroy session after test complete
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:33:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAEA860.8000203@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110419152013.GB6316@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:57:59PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>> When testing pynfs41, I got NFS4ERR_DELAY at some tests.
>> At a test case, we don't destroy the session after create.
>> So, this patch try to destroy session test complete.
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
> It seems a little tedious to have to do this by hand every time; could
> we do some automatic cleanup at the end of the test when the variable
> goes out of scope, or something like that?
I have try my best to find a automatic method to cleanup it,
but I can't get.
Maybe Fred can help us?
--
----
thanks
Mi Jinlong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-20 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 6:23 [PATCH 00/17] add some test case for pynfs41 Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:26 ` [PATCH 01/17] CLNT: check NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP for CREATE_SESSION Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 5:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-02 6:27 ` [PATCH 02/17] CLNT: test lease period of unconfirmed record Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:28 ` [PATCH 03/17] CLNT: check the csr_sequence at CREATE_SESSION Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 6:02 ` [PATCH 02/17] CLNT: test lease period of unconfirmed record J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-03 9:07 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-09 1:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-09 1:43 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:29 ` [PATCH 04/17] CLNT: test with ca_maxresponsesize is too small Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:29 ` [PATCH 05/17] CLNT: test reply too big Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/17] CLNT: test reply too big to cache Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:31 ` [PATCH 07/17] CLNT: test operation not in session Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:31 ` [PATCH 08/17] CLNT: test the sessionid, slotid and sequenceid for SEQUENCE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:32 ` [PATCH 09/17] CLNT: test Bad Sequenceid At Slot Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:33 ` [PATCH 10/17] CLNT: test resues slot ID Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 6:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-03 9:11 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 14:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-04 9:06 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-14 18:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-14 19:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 2:47 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-17 22:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-22 9:44 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-22 21:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-23 9:41 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:33 ` [PATCH 11/17] CLNT: DESTROY_SESSION not the fianl operation Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] CLNT: test DESTROY_SESSION not the sole operation Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 13/17] CLNT: add a simple test about RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:35 ` [PATCH 14/17] CLNT: test reclaim after RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:36 ` [PATCH 15/17] CLNT: test lock before RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-14 19:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 3:06 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-17 22:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-02 6:36 ` [PATCH 16/17] CLNT: test double RECLAIM_COMPLETE after create session Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:37 ` [PATCH 17/17] CLNT: test EXCLUSIVE4_1 for different verifier Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 5:56 ` [PATCH 00/17] add some test case for pynfs41 J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-28 8:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] a pynfs41 problem and some tests about RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 8:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] CLNT: try to destroy session after test complete Mi Jinlong
2011-04-19 15:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-04-20 9:33 ` Mi Jinlong [this message]
2011-03-28 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] CLNT: add a simple test about RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] CLNT: test reclaim after RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-04-19 22:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-28 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] CLNT: test lock before RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] CLNT: test double RECLAIM_COMPLETE after create session Mi Jinlong
2011-04-19 22:51 ` [PATCH 0/5] a pynfs41 problem and some tests about RECLAIM_COMPLETE J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DAEA860.8000203@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.