Re: [PATCH v2 09/15] admin-guide/hw-vuln: Correct prctl() argument description

From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	joseph.salisbury@canonical.com,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>,
	Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/15] admin-guide/hw-vuln: Correct prctl() argument description
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:32:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c0a8190-bd9f-4886-a156-854ae831b16a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313012451.1693807-10-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On 3/13/24 02:24, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Correct the description for arg4 which appears to be outdated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

Maybe it is better to keep these tests into a separated thread (?) Because they
are touching things that are not about the server, so it might create conflicts...

What I did in the past when adding a series that was part in the kernel (tracer)
and part of tools (rtla) was to split them into two series, then referencing
one on the other - Steven suggested... and it was a good thing... and
reduced the number of versions.

So I am not adding these self-tests on top of the dl series for now... because
there is also discussion about the patches... and I am not an expert in the
selftests.... I will add a reference to this thread in the v6 cover and keep
updating it as new versions show up... in this way, one thing does not block
the other.

Thoughts?

-- Daniel

> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst
> index cf1eeefdfc32..338d639a8127 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst
> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ arg3:
>  
>  arg4:
>      ``pid_type`` for which the operation applies. It is one of
> -    ``PR_SCHED_CORE_SCOPE_``-prefixed macro constants.  For example, if arg4
> -    is ``PR_SCHED_CORE_SCOPE_THREAD_GROUP``, then the operation of this command
> +    ``PIDTIME_``-prefixed macro constants.  For example, if arg4
> +    is ``PIDTYPE_TGID``, then the operation of this command
>      will be performed for all tasks in the task group of ``pid``.
>  
>  arg5: