All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: introduce BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:37:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cdb2b42-0097-c64a-d9c0-b7a1727c80de@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180123162605.GD13277@ming.t460p>

On 01/23/18 08:26, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:17:02AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 01/22/18 16:57, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> Even though RCU lock is held during dispatch, preemption or interrupt
>>> can happen too, so it is simply wrong to depend on the timing to make
>>> sure __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() can see the request in this situation.
>>
>> It is very unlikely that this race will ever be hit because that race exists
>> for less than one microsecond and the smallest timeout that can be specified
>> for delayed queue rerunning is one millisecond. Let's address this race if
>> anyone ever finds a way to hit it.
> 
> Please don't depend on the timing which is often fragile, as we can make it
> correct in a generic approach. Also we should avoid to make every driver to
> follow this way for dealing with most of STS_RESOURCE, right?

Wouldn't it be better to fix that race without changing the block layer 
API, e.g. by using call_rcu() for delayed queue runs? As you know 
call_rcu() will only call the specified function after a grace period. 
Since pushing back requests onto the dispatch list happens with the RCU 
lock held using call_rcu() for delayed queue runs would be sufficient to 
address this race.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-22  3:35 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq & dm: fix IO hang and deal with one performance issue Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: introduce BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2018-01-22 16:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-22 16:49   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-22 16:49     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23  0:57     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 16:17       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23 16:26         ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 16:37           ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-01-23 16:41             ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 16:47               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23 16:47                 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23 16:49                 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 16:54                   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23 16:54                     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23 16:59                     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 16:59                       ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 22:01                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23 22:01                         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-24  2:31                         ` Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm-rq: handle dispatch exception in dm_dispatch_clone_request() Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35   ` Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm-rq: return BLK_STS_* from map_request() Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35   ` Ming Lei
2018-01-22  5:35   ` Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] blk-mq: introduce blk_get_request_notify Ming Lei
2018-01-22 10:19   ` Ming Lei
2018-01-22 17:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-22 17:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23  1:29     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-22  3:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm-mpath: use blk_mq_alloc_request_notify for allocating blk-mq req Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4cdb2b42-0097-c64a-d9c0-b7a1727c80de@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.