From: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
To: kreijack@inwind.it, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Don't use LVM snapshot device
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:17:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5485EB23.8040103@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5485E1A0.4030602@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/8/2014 12:36 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> I like this approach, but as I wrote before, it seems that
> initramfs executes a "btrfs dev scan".... (see my previoue email
> 'Re: PROBLEM: #89121 BTRFS mixes up mounted devices with their
> snapshots' date 2014/12/03 9:34):
>
> $ grep -r "btrfs dev.*scan" /usr/share/initramfs-tools/
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/btrfs:
> /sbin/btrfs device scan 2> /dev/null
>
> (this is from a debian). However it has to be pointed out that
> fedora doesn't seems to do the same...
Need to fix that initramfs script then. On the other hand, if one
*does* run a scan with no arguments, then it probably is a good idea
to ignore snapshots.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUhesjAAoJENRVrw2cjl5RPRAIALK5ERJqRJLSsa6kBSIP8bWe
WP531ew49I0Tkc0o3YOCqq07tb4kZ5rsLsPaLE+s3adCe5/wYzQOox4x6ucak1gK
0igazFx9TYM65YRtFzIUAnj/CPN4WwIInwoAac4w2qwCKB56WUbSU60lEsOmFfRr
6m9EUYkBtMRiWfW2jjuj8iLnBW6glexAqTpW1eKWPfF0AGoUXc8AQboNwceFnHi3
vcjmQM6mhL5zH+FJ0Z/meTk/PwVdjEVJQIEcbMpvggAJeqxsm90GHVIsn8C7B80i
GcX8GHe+Gw3WJMsaW49slKa+MOjWt2SumN/lrKFYPVwQUguhvg0hC1UG5m3cJFo=
=64dH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 18:39 [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Don't use LVM snapshot device Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] Avoid to consider lvm snapshots when scanning devices Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-08 2:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-08 14:58 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-09 0:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-09 10:27 ` David Sterba
2014-12-09 18:19 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] 'btrfs device scan' skips lvm snapshots Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] Update 'btrfs device scan' man page Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] Add reference to BTRFS_SKIP_LVM_SNAPSHOT environment variable Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] Abort in case of device uuid conflict Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-05 7:26 ` [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Don't use LVM snapshot device Duncan
2014-12-05 18:39 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-08 15:30 ` Phillip Susi
2014-12-08 17:36 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-08 18:17 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2014-12-08 19:22 ` Robert White
2014-12-10 7:52 ` Anand Jain
2014-12-10 18:40 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5485EB23.8040103@ubuntu.com \
--to=psusi@ubuntu.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.