All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@virtuozzo.com>
To: Alexander Ivanov <alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	vsementsov@yandex-team.ru, kwolf@redhat.com, hreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] parallels: Move check of cluster outside image to a separate function
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:56:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <582f5f97-1307-dd98-c147-993c37fe96a3@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220818151456.2118470-7-alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>

On 18.08.2022 17:14, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> We will add more and more checks so we need a better code structure
> in parallels_co_check. Let each check performs in a separate loop
> in a separate helper.
> s->data_end fix relates to out-of-image check so move it
> to the helper too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Ivanov <alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>   block/parallels.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/parallels.c b/block/parallels.c
> index 3900a0f4a9..1c7626c867 100644
> --- a/block/parallels.c
> +++ b/block/parallels.c
> @@ -438,6 +438,46 @@ static void parallels_check_unclean(BlockDriverState *bs,
>       }
>   }
>   
> +static int parallels_check_outside_image(BlockDriverState *bs,
> +                                         BdrvCheckResult *res,
> +                                         BdrvCheckMode fix)
> +{
> +    BDRVParallelsState *s = bs->opaque;
> +    uint32_t i;
> +    int64_t off, size;
> +
> +    size = bdrv_getlength(bs->file->bs);
> +    if (size < 0) {
> +        res->check_errors++;
> +        return size;
> +    }
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < s->bat_size; i++) {
> +        off = bat2sect(s, i) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +        if (off > size) {
> +            fprintf(stderr, "%s cluster %u is outside image\n",
> +                    fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS ? "Repairing" : "ERROR", i);
> +            res->corruptions++;
> +            if (fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS) {
> +                parallels_set_bat_entry(s, i, 0);
> +                res->corruptions_fixed++;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * If there were an out-of-image cluster it would be repaired,
> +     * but s->data_end still would point outside image.
> +     * Fix s->data_end by the file size.
> +     */
> +    size >>= BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +    if (s->data_end > size) {
> +        s->data_end = size;
> +    }
and this is incorrect IMHO. In the next patch you could truncate the file
inside leak check and thus data_end will point to a wrong too lengthy
value.


> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int coroutine_fn parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
>                                              BdrvCheckResult *res,
>                                              BdrvCheckMode fix)
> @@ -457,6 +497,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
>   
>       parallels_check_unclean(bs, res, fix);
>   
> +    ret = parallels_check_outside_image(bs, res, fix);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
>       res->bfi.total_clusters = s->bat_size;
>       res->bfi.compressed_clusters = 0; /* compression is not supported */
>   
> @@ -469,19 +514,6 @@ static int coroutine_fn parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
>               continue;
>           }
>   
> -        /* cluster outside the image */
> -        if (off > size) {
> -            fprintf(stderr, "%s cluster %u is outside image\n",
> -                    fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS ? "Repairing" : "ERROR", i);
> -            res->corruptions++;
> -            if (fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS) {
> -                prev_off = 0;
> -                parallels_set_bat_entry(s, i, 0);
> -                res->corruptions_fixed++;
> -                continue;
> -            }
> -        }
> -
>           res->bfi.allocated_clusters++;
>           if (off > high_off) {
>               high_off = off;
> @@ -518,15 +550,6 @@ static int coroutine_fn parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
>               res->leaks_fixed += count;
>           }
>       }
> -    /*
> -     * If there were an out-of-image cluster it would be repaired,
> -     * but s->data_end still would point outside image.
> -     * Fix s->data_end by the file size.
> -     */
> -    size >>= BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> -    if (s->data_end > size) {
> -        s->data_end = size;
> -    }
>   out:
>       qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&s->lock);
>   



  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-19 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-18 15:14 [PATCH 0/9] parallels: Refactor the code of images checks and fix a bug Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/9] parallels: Out of image offset in BAT leads to image inflation Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/9] parallels: Fix data_end field value in parallels_co_check() Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-19 12:58   ` Denis V. Lunev
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/9] parallels: create parallels_set_bat_entry_helper() to assign BAT value Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 4/9] parallels: Use generic infrastructure for BAT writing in parallels_co_check() Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 5/9] parallels: Move check of unclean image to a separate function Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 6/9] parallels: Move check of cluster outside " Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-19 12:56   ` Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 7/9] parallels: Move check of leaks " Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 8/9] parallels: Move statistic collection " Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] parallels: Replace qemu_co_mutex_lock by WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD Alexander Ivanov
2022-08-19 12:53   ` Denis V. Lunev
2022-08-19  9:48 ` [PATCH 0/9] parallels: Refactor the code of images checks and fix a bug Denis V. Lunev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=582f5f97-1307-dd98-c147-993c37fe96a3@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.