Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] drm/i915/guc : Updating GuC and HuC firmware select function

From: Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] drm/i915/guc : Updating GuC and HuC firmware select function
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:51:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <594f15dd-6f62-438e-65a4-495e35bb4ba9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.y9lmjysaxaggs7@mwajdecz-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 11/12/2017 08:25 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2017 01:06:33 +0100, Sujaritha Sundaresan 
> <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Updating GuC and HuC firmware select function to support removing
>> i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading module parameter.
>>
>> v2: Clarifying the commit message (Anusha)
>>
>> v3: Unify seq_puts messages, Re-factoring code as per review (Michal)
>>
>> v4: Rebase
>>
>> v5: Separating message unification into a separate patch
>>
>> v6: Re-factoring code (Sagar, Michal)
>>     Rebase
>>
>> v7: Separating from previuos patch (Sagar)
>>     Rebase
>>
>> v8: Including change to intel_uc.c
>>     Applying review comments (Michal)
>>
>> v9: Including HAS_HUC macro
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
>> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
>> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c | 6 ++----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h | 2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c    | 3 ++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c     | 7 +++++++
>>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> index 69ba015..112c89d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
>>   *
>>   * Return: zero when we know firmware, non-zero in other case
>>   */
>> -int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> +void intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>  {
>>      struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>> @@ -91,10 +91,8 @@ int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>          guc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MINOR;
>>      } else {
>>          DRM_ERROR("No GuC firmware known for platform with GuC!\n");
>> -        return -ENOENT;
>> +        return;
>>      }
>> -
>> -    return 0;
>>  }
>> static void guc_prepare_xfer(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> index 023f5ba..7f6ccaf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>> struct intel_guc;
>> -int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc);
>> +void intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc);
>>  int intel_guc_fw_upload(struct intel_guc *guc);
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> index 98d1725..7f4bbc1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ void intel_huc_select_fw(struct intel_huc *huc)
>>          huc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MAJOR;
>>          huc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MINOR;
>>      } else {
>> -        DRM_ERROR("No HuC firmware known for platform with HuC!\n");
>> +        if (HAS_HUC(dev_priv))
>
> Can we move this check to the caller ? see intel_uc_init_fw
> And what about GuC ?
>
Will do. Similar changes to guc as well.
>> +            DRM_ERROR("No HuC firmware known for platform with 
>> HuC!\n");
>>          return;
>>      }
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> index 648e59c..320165a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> @@ -82,11 +82,18 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  {
>> +    struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>> +    struct intel_huc *huc = &dev_priv->huc;
>> +
>>      intel_guc_init_early(&dev_priv->guc);
>
> Btw, now you can pass 'guc' as param
>

Will do.
>> +    intel_guc_fw_select(guc);
>> +    intel_huc_select_fw(huc);
>>  }
>> void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  {
>> +    if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>> +        return;
>>      intel_uc_fw_fetch(dev_priv, &dev_priv->huc.fw);
>>      intel_uc_fw_fetch(dev_priv, &dev_priv->guc.fw);
>>  }

Thanks for the review.

Regards,
Sujaritha
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx