From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Support children for legacy device properties
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:05:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ab2968e-8ba5-adea-7862-3e9114623d63@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917181603.125492-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
On 9/17/2018 8:15 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The generic device properties APIs are very helpful as they allow abstracting
> away details of the platform (whether it is ACPI, device tree, or legacy board
> file), so that individual driver does not need separate code paths to support
> all variants. However there are drivers that currently can not use generic
> device properties API as they need notion of children properties, for example
> gpio_keys driver, that expects every button to be described as a sub-node of
> main device.
>
> This patch series introduces notion of sub-nodes for static properties and ties
> it up with GPIO lookup tables so that they are usable with sub-nodes as well.
I don't have any objections against this series.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-18 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-17 18:15 [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Support children for legacy device properties Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-17 18:15 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/5] device property: split generic properties and property sets Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/5] device property: introduce notion of subnodes for legacy boards Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-19 15:10 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-19 17:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-20 10:16 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-21 23:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-24 7:29 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-20 13:53 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-21 15:36 ` Linus Walleij
2018-09-24 10:20 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-21 23:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-24 13:20 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-24 18:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-25 12:19 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-10-05 21:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-10-11 8:18 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/5] device property: export property_set structure Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/5] gpiolib: add support for fetching descriptors from static properties Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 9:02 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-09-18 17:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-19 8:33 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/5] RFC: ARM: simone: Hacked in keys Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 4:23 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Support children for legacy device properties Andy Shevchenko
2018-09-18 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-09-19 19:55 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ab2968e-8ba5-adea-7862-3e9114623d63@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.