All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 00/11] rdmavt/hfi1 updates for next
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:33:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c72c47c-e5c0-3389-a16f-4cf39f2d4a86@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211162140.GB6622@ziepe.ca>

On 12/11/2019 11:21 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:34:40AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
>> On 11/26/2019 9:12 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
>>> Here are some refactoring and code reorg patches for the merge window. Nothing
>>> too scary, no new features. This lays the ground work for stuff coming in
>>> future merge cycles.
>>>
>>> There is also one bug fix, from Kaike.
>>>
>>> Changes from v1
>>> Fix Review-by tags with corrupted email address.
>>>
>>>
>>> Grzegorz Andrejczuk (3):
>>>         IB/hfi1: Move common receive IRQ code to function
>>>         IB/hfi1: Decouple IRQ name from type
>>>         IB/hfi1: Return void in packet receiving functions
>>>
>>> Kaike Wan (1):
>>>         IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item
>>>
>>> Michael J. Ruhl (1):
>>>         IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs
>>>
>>> Mike Marciniszyn (6):
>>>         IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members
>>>         IB/hfi1: Move chip specific functions to chip.c
>>>         IB/hfi1: Add fast and slow handlers for receive context
>>>         IB/hfi1: IB/hfi1: Add an API to handle special case drop
>>>         IB/hfi1: Create API for auto activate
>>>         IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header
>>
>> I guess these didn't catch the train for 5.5 merge window. Do I need to
>> resubmit to break this into two series, one for RC and one for next?
> 
> It is more reliable if it shows in patchworks as you want

Ok, you can toss this series then if you haven't yet and I'll respin and 
resubmit.

> 
>> I think 1, 9, 10, and 11 could/should probably go for RC.
> 
> Make sure they have suitable commit messages please

Will do.

-Denny

      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26 14:12 [PATCH for-next v2 00/11] rdmavt/hfi1 updates for next Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 01/11] IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 02/11] IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs Dennis Dalessandro
2019-12-02 13:30   ` Ruhl, Michael J
2019-12-05 13:49   ` [PATCH for-next v3] " Dennis Dalessandro
2020-01-03 19:48     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 03/11] IB/hfi1: Move chip specific functions to chip.c Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 04/11] IB/hfi1: Add fast and slow handlers for receive context Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 05/11] IB/hfi1: Move common receive IRQ code to function Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 06/11] IB/hfi1: IB/hfi1: Add an API to handle special case drop Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 07/11] IB/hfi1: Create API for auto activate Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH for-next v2 08/11] IB/hfi1: Decouple IRQ name from type Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:13 ` [PATCH for-next v2 09/11] IB/hfi1: Return void in packet receiving functions Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:13 ` [PATCH for-next v2 10/11] IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 14:13 ` [PATCH for-next v2 11/11] IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item Dennis Dalessandro
2019-11-26 15:31 ` [PATCH for-next v2 00/11] rdmavt/hfi1 updates for next Jason Gunthorpe
2019-12-11 13:34 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-12-11 16:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-12-11 16:33     ` Dennis Dalessandro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c72c47c-e5c0-3389-a16f-4cf39f2d4a86@intel.com \
    --to=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.