All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	<shuah@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	<farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/6] iommufd: Add iommufd_access_change_ioas helper
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:23:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d7d275ff12c1c991ac80392b19f1ebf5214177d.1690440730.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1690440730.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

The complication of the mutex and refcount will be amplified after we
introduce the replace support for access. So, add a preparatory change
of a constitutive helper iommufd_access_change_ioas(), to take care of
the existing iommufd_access_attach() and iommufd_access_detach().

Also, update the unprotect routine in iommufd_access_destroy_object()
to calling the new iommufd_access_change_ioas() helper.

Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
index 7a3e8660b902..d9680a247e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -684,17 +684,69 @@ void iommufd_device_detach(struct iommufd_device *idev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_detach, IOMMUFD);
 
+static int iommufd_access_change_ioas(struct iommufd_access *access,
+				      struct iommufd_ioas *new_ioas)
+{
+	u32 iopt_access_list_id = access->iopt_access_list_id;
+	struct iommufd_ioas *cur_ioas = access->ioas;
+	int rc;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&access->ioas_lock);
+
+	/* We are racing with a concurrent detach, bail */
+	if (cur_ioas != access->ioas_unpin)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(new_ioas))
+		return PTR_ERR(new_ioas);
+
+	if (cur_ioas == new_ioas) {
+		/* Do not forget to put since we allow a duplication */
+		iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Set ioas to NULL to block any further iommufd_access_pin_pages().
+	 * iommufd_access_unpin_pages() can continue using access->ioas_unpin.
+	 */
+	access->ioas = NULL;
+
+	if (new_ioas) {
+		rc = iopt_add_access(&new_ioas->iopt, access);
+		if (rc) {
+			iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
+			access->ioas = cur_ioas;
+			return rc;
+		}
+		iommufd_ref_to_users(&new_ioas->obj);
+	}
+
+	if (cur_ioas) {
+		if (access->ops->unmap) {
+			mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+			access->ops->unmap(access->data, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+			mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		}
+		iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access, iopt_access_list_id);
+		refcount_dec(&cur_ioas->obj.users);
+	}
+
+	access->ioas = new_ioas;
+	access->ioas_unpin = new_ioas;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void iommufd_access_destroy_object(struct iommufd_object *obj)
 {
 	struct iommufd_access *access =
 		container_of(obj, struct iommufd_access, obj);
 
-	if (access->ioas) {
-		iopt_remove_access(&access->ioas->iopt, access,
-				   access->iopt_access_list_id);
-		refcount_dec(&access->ioas->obj.users);
-		access->ioas = NULL;
-	}
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (access->ioas)
+		WARN_ON(iommufd_access_change_ioas(access, NULL));
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 	iommufd_ctx_put(access->ictx);
 }
 
@@ -761,60 +813,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_destroy, IOMMUFD);
 
 void iommufd_access_detach(struct iommufd_access *access)
 {
-	struct iommufd_ioas *cur_ioas = access->ioas;
+	int rc;
 
 	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
-	if (WARN_ON(!access->ioas))
-		goto out;
-	/*
-	 * Set ioas to NULL to block any further iommufd_access_pin_pages().
-	 * iommufd_access_unpin_pages() can continue using access->ioas_unpin.
-	 */
-	access->ioas = NULL;
-
-	if (access->ops->unmap) {
+	if (WARN_ON(!access->ioas)) {
 		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-		access->ops->unmap(access->data, 0, ULONG_MAX);
-		mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		return;
 	}
-	iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access,
-			   access->iopt_access_list_id);
-	refcount_dec(&cur_ioas->obj.users);
-out:
-	access->ioas_unpin = NULL;
+	rc = iommufd_access_change_ioas(access, NULL);
+	WARN_ON(rc);
 	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_detach, IOMMUFD);
 
 int iommufd_access_attach(struct iommufd_access *access, u32 ioas_id)
 {
-	struct iommufd_ioas *new_ioas;
-	int rc = 0;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *ictx = access->ictx;
+	int rc;
 
 	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
-	if (WARN_ON(access->ioas || access->ioas_unpin)) {
+	if (WARN_ON(access->ioas)) {
 		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	new_ioas = iommufd_get_ioas(access->ictx, ioas_id);
-	if (IS_ERR(new_ioas)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-		return PTR_ERR(new_ioas);
-	}
-
-	rc = iopt_add_access(&new_ioas->iopt, access);
-	if (rc) {
-		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-		iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
-		return rc;
-	}
-	iommufd_ref_to_users(&new_ioas->obj);
-
-	access->ioas = new_ioas;
-	access->ioas_unpin = new_ioas;
+	rc = iommufd_access_change_ioas(access,
+					iommufd_get_ioas(ictx, ioas_id));
 	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-	return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_attach, IOMMUFD);
 
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-27  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-27  7:23 [PATCH v9 0/6] cover-letter: Add IO page table replacement support Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27  7:23 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] vfio: Do not allow !ops->dma_unmap in vfio_pin/unpin_pages() Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27  7:23 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] iommufd: Allow passing in iopt_access_list_id to iopt_remove_access() Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27  9:07   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27 14:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-27  7:23 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2023-07-27 14:40   ` [PATCH v9 3/6] iommufd: Add iommufd_access_change_ioas helper Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-27 18:47     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27  7:23 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] iommufd: Add iommufd_access_replace() API Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27  7:23 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_ACCESS_REPLACE_IOAS coverage Nicolin Chen
2023-07-27  7:23 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] vfio: Support IO page table replacement Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d7d275ff12c1c991ac80392b19f1ebf5214177d.1690440730.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.