All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Bhupinder Thakur <bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm: Add support for 16 bit VMIDs
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:55:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ef6c4da-9e15-0967-e257-9fa578e4a17b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480069983-21138-1-git-send-email-bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>

Hi Bhupinder,

On 25/11/16 10:33, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
> VMID space is increased to 16-bits from 8-bits in ARMv8 8.1 revision.
> This allows more than 256 VMs to be supported by Xen.
>
> This change adds support for 16-bit VMIDs in Xen based on whether the
> architecture supports it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupinder Thakur <bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>

The tag reviewed-by has a strong meaning, it means that the person has 
fully reviewed the code and he agrees with the modifications (i.e the 
code is good to be pushed). For more details see a good description in 
in Linux doc (see [1]).

In this case, neither Stefano nor I gave it. So please drop them until 
one of us formally gave him. (e.g Reviewed-by: Name <email>).

> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/p2m.c              | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  xen/arch/arm/setup.c            |  3 +-
>  xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h       |  4 +--
>  xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 18 ++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
> index cc5634b..f036cfb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <xen/vm_event.h>
>  #include <xen/monitor.h>
>  #include <xen/iocap.h>
> +#include <xen/xmalloc.h>
>  #include <public/vm_event.h>
>  #include <asm/flushtlb.h>
>  #include <asm/gic.h>
> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ static unsigned int __read_mostly p2m_root_order;
>  static unsigned int __read_mostly p2m_root_level;
>  #define P2M_ROOT_ORDER    p2m_root_order
>  #define P2M_ROOT_LEVEL p2m_root_level
> +static unsigned int __read_mostly max_vmid;

I would much prefer if max_vmid and MAX_VMID are defined together.

>  #else
>  /* First level P2M is alway 2 consecutive pages */
>  #define P2M_ROOT_LEVEL 1
> @@ -1219,7 +1221,7 @@ static int p2m_alloc_table(struct domain *d)
>
>      p2m->root = page;
>
> -    p2m->vttbr = page_to_maddr(p2m->root) | ((uint64_t)p2m->vmid & 0xff) << 48;
> +    p2m->vttbr = page_to_maddr(p2m->root) | ((uint64_t)p2m->vmid << 48);
>
>      /*
>       * Make sure that all TLBs corresponding to the new VMID are flushed
> @@ -1230,20 +1232,68 @@ static int p2m_alloc_table(struct domain *d)
>      return 0;
>  }
>
> -#define MAX_VMID 256
> +#define MAX_VMID_8_BIT  (1UL << 8)
> +#define MAX_VMID_16_BIT (1UL << 16)
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> +#define MAX_VMID        max_vmid
> +#else
> +#define MAX_VMID        MAX_VMID_8_BIT
> +#endif
> +
>  #define INVALID_VMID 0 /* VMID 0 is reserved */
>
>  static spinlock_t vmid_alloc_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>
>  /*
> - * VTTBR_EL2 VMID field is 8 bits. Using a bitmap here limits us to
> - * 256 concurrent domains.
> + * VTTBR_EL2 VMID field is 8 or 16 bits. Aarch64 supports 16-bit VMID.
> + * Using a bitmap here limits us to 256 or 65536 (for Aarch64) concurrent
> + * domains. The bitmap space will be allocated dynamically based on
> + * whether 8 or 16 bit VMIDs are supported.
>   */
> -static DECLARE_BITMAP(vmid_mask, MAX_VMID);
> +static unsigned long *vmid_mask=NULL;

Coding style here.

vmid_mask = NULL;

However, the NULL is not necessary here as global variable are 
initialized to 0 by default.

>
> -void p2m_vmid_allocator_init(void)
> +int p2m_vmid_allocator_init(void)
>  {
> -    set_bit(INVALID_VMID, vmid_mask);
> +    int ret=0;

Coding style;

int ret = 0;

> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> +
> +    unsigned int cpu;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * initialize max_vmid to 16 bits by default
> +     */
> +    max_vmid = MAX_VMID_16_BIT;

This could be done at the declaration of max_vmid.

> +
> +    /*
> +     * if any cpu does not support 16-bit VMID then restrict the
> +     * max VMIDs which can be allocated to 256
> +     */
> +    for_each_online_cpu ( cpu )
> +    {
> +        const struct cpuinfo_arm *info = &cpu_data[cpu];
> +
> +        if ( info->mm64.vmid_bits != MM64_VMID_16_BITS_SUPPORT )
> +        {
> +            max_vmid = MAX_VMID_8_BIT;
> +            break;
> +        }
> +    }

I still think this is very confusing to consider 16-bit VMID by default 
as this is an enhancement in a newer architecture.

I would prefer to see the loop inverted, i.e checking whether all the 
CPUs support 16-bit and set max_vmid to 16 bit if supported.

If you disagree please explain why.

> +
> +#endif
> +
> +    /*
> +     * allocate space for vmid_mask based on max_vmid
> +     */
> +    vmid_mask = xzalloc_array(unsigned long, BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_VMID));
> +
> +    if ( vmid_mask )
> +        set_bit(INVALID_VMID, vmid_mask);
> +    else
> +        ret = -1;
> +
> +    return ret;
>  }
>
>  static int p2m_alloc_vmid(struct domain *d)
> @@ -1646,6 +1696,10 @@ void __init setup_virt_paging(void)
>
>      val |= VTCR_PS(pa_range);
>      val |= VTCR_TG0_4K;
> +
> +    /* set the VS bit only if 16 bit VMID is supported */
> +    if ( MAX_VMID == MAX_VMID_16_BIT )
> +        val |= VTCR_VS;
>      val |= VTCR_SL0(pa_range_info[pa_range].sl0);
>      val |= VTCR_T0SZ(pa_range_info[pa_range].t0sz);
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> index 38eb888..e240b12 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> @@ -789,7 +789,8 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
>
>      gic_init();
>
> -    p2m_vmid_allocator_init();
> +    if ( p2m_vmid_allocator_init() != 0 )
> +        panic("Could not allocate VMID bitmap space");

I am not sure why we have to initialize the VMID allocator far before 
setting up the stage-2 translation (see call setup_virt_paging).

Overall, VMID are part of stage-2 subsystem. So I think it would be 
better to move this call in setup_virt_paging.

With that you could take advantage of the for_each_online loop in 
setup_virt_paging and avoid to have go through again all CPUs.

So what I would like to see is:
    - Patch #1: move p2m_vmid_allocator_init in setup_virt_paging
    - Patch #2: Add support for 16 bit VMIDs

>
>      softirq_init();
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> index fdb6b47..b998e69 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct p2m_domain {
>      struct page_info *root;
>
>      /* Current VMID in use */
> -    uint8_t vmid;
> +    uint16_t vmid;
>
>      /* Current Translation Table Base Register for the p2m */
>      uint64_t vttbr;
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void p2m_altp2m_check(struct vcpu *v, uint16_t idx)
>  }
>
>  /* Initialise vmid allocator */
> -void p2m_vmid_allocator_init(void);
> +int p2m_vmid_allocator_init(void);
>
>  /* Second stage paging setup, to be called on all CPUs */
>  void setup_virt_paging(void);
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
> index 15bf890..48ce59b 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
> @@ -215,6 +215,8 @@
>
>  #define VTCR_PS(x)      ((x)<<16)
>
> +#define VTCR_VS    	    (_AC(0x1,UL)<<19)
> +
>  #endif
>
>  #define VTCR_RES1       (_AC(1,UL)<<31)
> @@ -269,6 +271,11 @@
>  /* FSR long format */
>  #define FSRL_STATUS_DEBUG       (_AC(0x22,UL)<<0)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> +#define MM64_VMID_8_BITS_SUPPORT    0x0
> +#define MM64_VMID_16_BITS_SUPPORT   0x2
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
>  struct cpuinfo_arm {
> @@ -337,7 +344,16 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
>              unsigned long tgranule_64K:4;
>              unsigned long tgranule_4K:4;
>              unsigned long __res0:32;
> -       };
> +
> +            unsigned long hafdbs:4;
> +            unsigned long vmid_bits:4;
> +            unsigned long vh:4;
> +            unsigned long hpds:4;
> +            unsigned long lo:4;
> +            unsigned long pan:4;
> +            unsigned long __res1:8;
> +            unsigned long __res2:32;
> +        };
>      } mm64;
>
>      struct {
>

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-29 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-25 10:33 [PATCH v2] xen/arm: Add support for 16 bit VMIDs Bhupinder Thakur
2016-11-29 12:55 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-11-30 13:31   ` Bhupinder Thakur
2016-12-06 15:44     ` Julien Grall
2016-12-09 10:49       ` Bhupinder Thakur
2016-12-09 18:11         ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ef6c4da-9e15-0967-e257-9fa578e4a17b@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.