From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Ives van Hoorne <ives@codesandbox.io>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/migrate: Fix read-only page got writable when recover pte
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:28:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65FA2E7E-1F12-4919-BD79-11159934CF2C@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221110203132.1498183-2-peterx@redhat.com>
On Nov 10, 2022, at 12:31 PM, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> Ives van Hoorne from codesandbox.io reported an issue regarding possible
> data loss of uffd-wp when applied to memfds on heavily loaded systems. The
> sympton is some read page got data mismatch from the snapshot child VMs.
symptom (if you care)
Other than that LGTM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 20:31 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/migrate: Fix writable pte for read migration entry Peter Xu
2022-11-10 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/migrate: Fix read-only page got writable when recover pte Peter Xu
2022-11-10 21:28 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2022-11-10 22:09 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-10 21:53 ` Ives van Hoorne
2022-11-10 22:08 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-10 23:42 ` Alistair Popple
2022-11-13 23:56 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-14 6:22 ` Alistair Popple
2022-11-14 16:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-14 20:09 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-15 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-15 16:08 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-15 17:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-15 17:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-15 18:11 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-15 18:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-15 18:03 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-15 18:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-10 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/uffd: Sanity check write bit for uffd-wp protected ptes Peter Xu
2022-11-11 22:06 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-13 22:33 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-12 2:59 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65FA2E7E-1F12-4919-BD79-11159934CF2C@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=ives@codesandbox.io \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.