From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] selftests/net: fix GRO coalesce test and add ext header coalesce tests
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:48:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69282fed-2415-47e8-b3d3-34939ec3eb56@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac6fb684-c00e-449c-92c3-99358a927ade@gmail.com>
Currently there is no test which checks that IPv6 extension header packets
successfully coalesce. This commit adds a test, which verifies two IPv6
packets with HBH extension headers do coalesce, and another test which
checks that packets with different extension header data do not coalesce
in GRO.
I changed the receive socket filter to accept a packet with one extension
header. This change exposed a bug in the fragment test -- the old BPF did
not accept the fragment packet. I updated correct_num_packets in the
fragment test accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
index 30024d0ed373..353e1e867fbb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
@@ -71,6 +71,12 @@
#define MAX_PAYLOAD (IP_MAXPACKET - sizeof(struct tcphdr) - sizeof(struct ipv6hdr))
#define NUM_LARGE_PKT (MAX_PAYLOAD / MSS)
#define MAX_HDR_LEN (ETH_HLEN + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + sizeof(struct tcphdr))
+#define MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE 8
+#define EXT_PAYLOAD_1 "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"
+#define EXT_PAYLOAD_2 "\x11\x11\x11\x11\x11\x11"
+
+#define ipv6_optlen(p) (((p)->hdrlen+1) << 3) /* calculate IPv6 extension header len */
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]))
static const char *addr6_src = "fdaa::2";
static const char *addr6_dst = "fdaa::1";
@@ -104,7 +110,7 @@ static void setup_sock_filter(int fd)
const int dport_off = tcp_offset + offsetof(struct tcphdr, dest);
const int ethproto_off = offsetof(struct ethhdr, h_proto);
int optlen = 0;
- int ipproto_off;
+ int ipproto_off, opt_ipproto_off;
int next_off;
if (proto == PF_INET)
@@ -116,14 +122,30 @@ static void setup_sock_filter(int fd)
if (strcmp(testname, "ip") == 0) {
if (proto == PF_INET)
optlen = sizeof(struct ip_timestamp);
- else
- optlen = sizeof(struct ip6_frag);
+ else {
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct ip6_hbh) > MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct ip6_dest) > MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct ip6_frag) > MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE);
+
+ /* same size for HBH and Fragment extension header types */
+ optlen = MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE;
+ opt_ipproto_off = ETH_HLEN + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)
+ + offsetof(struct ip6_ext, ip6e_nxt);
+ }
}
+ /* this filter validates the following:
+ * - packet is IPv4/IPv6 according to the running test.
+ * - packet is TCP. Also handles the case of one extension header and then TCP.
+ * - checks the packet tcp dport equals to DPORT. Also handles the case of one
+ * extension header and then TCP.
+ */
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_H + BPF_ABS, ethproto_off),
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, ntohs(ethhdr_proto), 0, 7),
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, ntohs(ethhdr_proto), 0, 9),
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_B + BPF_ABS, ipproto_off),
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, IPPROTO_TCP, 2, 0),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_B + BPF_ABS, opt_ipproto_off),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, IPPROTO_TCP, 0, 5),
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_H + BPF_ABS, dport_off),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, DPORT, 2, 0),
@@ -576,6 +598,39 @@ static void add_ipv4_ts_option(void *buf, void *optpkt)
iph->check = checksum_fold(iph, sizeof(struct iphdr) + optlen, 0);
}
+static void add_ipv6_exthdr(void *buf, void *optpkt, __u8 exthdr_type, char *ext_payload)
+{
+ struct ipv6_opt_hdr *exthdr = (struct ipv6_opt_hdr *)(optpkt + tcp_offset);
+ struct ipv6hdr *iph = (struct ipv6hdr *)(optpkt + ETH_HLEN);
+ char *exthdr_payload_start = (char *)(exthdr + 1);
+
+ exthdr->hdrlen = 0;
+ exthdr->nexthdr = IPPROTO_TCP;
+
+ memcpy(exthdr_payload_start, ext_payload, MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE - sizeof(*exthdr));
+
+ memcpy(optpkt, buf, tcp_offset);
+ memcpy(optpkt + tcp_offset + MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE, buf + tcp_offset,
+ sizeof(struct tcphdr) + PAYLOAD_LEN);
+
+ iph->nexthdr = exthdr_type;
+ iph->payload_len = htons(ntohs(iph->payload_len) + MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE);
+}
+
+static void send_ipv6_exthdr(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, char *ext_data1, char *ext_data2)
+{
+ static char buf[MAX_HDR_LEN + PAYLOAD_LEN];
+ static char exthdr_pck[sizeof(buf) + MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE];
+
+ create_packet(buf, 0, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
+ add_ipv6_exthdr(buf, exthdr_pck, IPPROTO_HOPOPTS, ext_data1);
+ write_packet(fd, exthdr_pck, total_hdr_len + PAYLOAD_LEN + MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE, daddr);
+
+ create_packet(buf, PAYLOAD_LEN * 1, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
+ add_ipv6_exthdr(buf, exthdr_pck, IPPROTO_HOPOPTS, ext_data2);
+ write_packet(fd, exthdr_pck, total_hdr_len + PAYLOAD_LEN + MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE, daddr);
+}
+
/* IPv4 options shouldn't coalesce */
static void send_ip_options(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr)
{
@@ -697,7 +752,7 @@ static void send_fragment6(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr)
create_packet(buf, PAYLOAD_LEN * i, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
write_packet(fd, buf, bufpkt_len, daddr);
}
-
+ sleep(1);
create_packet(buf, PAYLOAD_LEN * 2, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
memset(extpkt, 0, extpkt_len);
@@ -760,6 +815,7 @@ static void check_recv_pkts(int fd, int *correct_payload,
vlog("}, Total %d packets\nReceived {", correct_num_pkts);
while (1) {
+ ip_ext_len = 0;
pkt_size = recv(fd, buffer, IP_MAXPACKET + ETH_HLEN + 1, 0);
if (pkt_size < 0)
error(1, errno, "could not receive");
@@ -767,7 +823,7 @@ static void check_recv_pkts(int fd, int *correct_payload,
if (iph->version == 4)
ip_ext_len = (iph->ihl - 5) * 4;
else if (ip6h->version == 6 && ip6h->nexthdr != IPPROTO_TCP)
- ip_ext_len = sizeof(struct ip6_frag);
+ ip_ext_len = MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE;
tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(buffer + tcp_offset + ip_ext_len);
@@ -880,7 +936,21 @@ static void gro_sender(void)
sleep(1);
write_packet(txfd, fin_pkt, total_hdr_len, &daddr);
} else if (proto == PF_INET6) {
+ sleep(1);
send_fragment6(txfd, &daddr);
+ sleep(1);
+ write_packet(txfd, fin_pkt, total_hdr_len, &daddr);
+
+ sleep(1);
+ /* send IPv6 packets with ext header with same payload */
+ send_ipv6_exthdr(txfd, &daddr, EXT_PAYLOAD_1, EXT_PAYLOAD_1);
+ sleep(1);
+ write_packet(txfd, fin_pkt, total_hdr_len, &daddr);
+
+ sleep(1);
+ /* send IPv6 packets with ext header with different payload */
+ send_ipv6_exthdr(txfd, &daddr, EXT_PAYLOAD_1, EXT_PAYLOAD_2);
+ sleep(1);
write_packet(txfd, fin_pkt, total_hdr_len, &daddr);
}
} else if (strcmp(testname, "large") == 0) {
@@ -997,6 +1067,17 @@ static void gro_receiver(void)
*/
printf("fragmented ip6 doesn't coalesce: ");
correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ correct_payload[1] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ correct_payload[2] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 3);
+
+ printf("ipv6 with ext header does coalesce: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 1);
+
+ printf("ipv6 with ext header with different payloads doesn't coalesce: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ correct_payload[1] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 2);
}
} else if (strcmp(testname, "large") == 0) {
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 14:36 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: gro: reduce extension header parsing overhead Richard Gobert
2024-01-03 14:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: gso: add HBH extension header offload support Richard Gobert
2024-01-03 14:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: gro: parse ipv6 ext headers without frag0 invalidation Richard Gobert
2024-01-03 16:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-03 14:48 ` Richard Gobert [this message]
2024-01-05 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: gro: reduce extension header parsing overhead patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69282fed-2415-47e8-b3d3-34939ec3eb56@gmail.com \
--to=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.