All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Pete Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:00:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e55c61d-7587-4191-1fc5-de43e26986d7@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170312133250.GA7772@singhal-Inspiron-5558>

On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
> 
> In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
> changes.  Replace it with a lock in the devices global data.
> 
> Fix some coding style issues related to white space also.
> 
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> index dfd8b71..ca99d82 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> @@ -81,12 +81,14 @@
>   * @tx:         transmit buffer
>   * @rx:         receive buffer
>   * @buf_lock:       mutex to protect tx and rx
> + * @lock:	protect sensor state

It might make sense to reuse the existing lock which currently protects the
read/write functions. You can do this by introducing a variant of
ade7753_spi_{read,write}_reg_16() that does not take a lock and use these to
implement the read-modify-write cycle in a protected section.

Looking through the driver there seem to be other places as well that do
read-modify-write that should be protected by a lock, but currently are not.
This might be a good task.

>   **/
>  struct ade7753_state {
> -	    struct spi_device   *us;
> -		    struct mutex        buf_lock;
> -			    u8          tx[ADE7753_MAX_TX] ____cacheline_aligned;
> -				    u8          rx[ADE7753_MAX_RX];
> +	struct spi_device   *us;
> +	struct mutex        buf_lock;
> +	struct mutex        lock;	/* protect sensor state */
> +	u8          tx[ADE7753_MAX_TX] ____cacheline_aligned;
> +	u8          rx[ADE7753_MAX_RX];
>  };
>  
>  static int ade7753_spi_write_reg_8(struct device *dev,
> @@ -484,7 +486,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
>  	if (!val)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +	mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>  
>  	t = 27900 / val;
>  	if (t > 0)
> @@ -505,7 +507,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
>  	ret = ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(dev, ADE7753_MODE, reg);
>  
>  out:
> -	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>  
>  	return ret ? ret : len;
>  }
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-13 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-12 13:32 [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock simran singhal
2017-03-12 18:33 ` [Outreachy kernel] " Alison Schofield
2017-03-13  3:58   ` SIMRAN SINGHAL
2017-03-13  5:29     ` Alison Schofield
2017-03-13 12:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2017-03-13 12:33   ` SIMRAN SINGHAL
2017-03-13 13:34     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2017-03-17  9:32   ` [Outreachy kernel] " Gargi Sharma
2017-03-19 10:31     ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-03-19 13:16       ` Gargi Sharma
2017-03-19 17:08         ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-03-19 18:02   ` Gargi Sharma
2017-09-18  6:59 Himanshi Jain
2017-09-18 10:06 ` Greg KH
2017-09-24 14:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-09-27 14:57   ` Himanshi Jain
2017-09-30 20:17     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e55c61d-7587-4191-1fc5-de43e26986d7@metafoo.de \
    --to=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=singhalsimran0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.