Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@mihalicyn.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	sdf@google.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, krisman@suse.de,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:32:45 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fb87516-c833-4af2-8cab-60c9accbcd1f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21dc6507-e1f5-a261-7a9c-7e0cb22e1fc7@linux.dev>

On 10/19/23 2:37 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 10/19/23 1:04?PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/19/23 1:12 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>>> On 10/16/23 6:47?AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
>>>> index 0087f8c071e7..f4c156a1987e 100644
>>>> --- a/net/socket.c
>>>> +++ b/net/socket.c
>>>> @@ -2350,6 +2350,42 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(setsockopt, int, fd, int, level, int, optname,
>>>>    INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(bool tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level,
>>>>                                 int optname));
>>>>    +int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
>>>> +               int optname, sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
>>>> +    const struct proto_ops *ops;
>>>> +    int err;
>>>> +
>>>> +    err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
>>>> +    if (err)
>>>> +        return err;
>>>> +
>>>> +    ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
>>>> +    if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
>>>> +        err = sk_getsockopt(sock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
>>>> +    } else if (unlikely(!ops->getsockopt)) {
>>>> +        err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +        if (WARN_ONCE(optval.is_kernel || optlen.is_kernel,
>>>> +                  "Invalid argument type"))
>>>> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> +
>>>> +        err = ops->getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval.user,
>>>> +                      optlen.user);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!compat) {
>>>> +        max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
>>>
>>> The max_optlen was done before the above sk_getsockopt. The bpf CI cannot catch it because it cannot apply patch 5 cleanly. I ran the following out of the linux-block tree:
>>>
>>> $> ./test_progs -t sockopt_sk
>>> test_sockopt_sk:PASS:join_cgroup /sockopt_sk 0 nsec
>>> run_test:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
>>> run_test:PASS:setsockopt_link 0 nsec
>>> run_test:PASS:getsockopt_link 0 nsec
>>> (/data/users/kafai/fb-kernel/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c:111: errno: Operation not permitted) Failed to call getsockopt, ret=-1
>>> run_test:FAIL:getsetsockopt unexpected error: -1 (errno 1)
>>> #217     sockopt_sk:FAIL
>>
>> Does it work with this incremental? I can fold that in, will rebase
>> anyway to collect acks.
> 
> Yes, that should work.
> 
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Thanks Martin, I'll add that too.

-- 
Jens Axboe