All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: "ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"andrii@kernel.org" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"martin.lau@linux.dev" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>, "yhs@fb.com" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"sdf@google.com" <sdf@google.com>,
	"haoluo@google.com" <haoluo@google.com>,
	"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"jarkko@kernel.org" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"paul@paul-moore.com" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 5/9] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() kfuncs
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:40:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7278db1e90de4c7bb669449e897d1946@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACYkzJ718fr2TsvX0JPhTRiMQH8=HwaxLShrETLvrhPUy2p8OQ@mail.gmail.com>

> From: KP Singh [mailto:kpsingh@kernel.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 2:50 AM

[...]

> > +/**
> > + * bpf_key_put - decrement key reference count if key is valid and free
> bpf_key
> > + * @bkey: bpf_key structure
> > + *
> > + * Decrement the reference count of the key inside *bkey*, if the pointer
> > + * is valid, and free *bkey*.
> > + */
> 
> This is more of a style thing but your comment literally describes the
> small function
> below. Do we really need this?

Thanks for the review, KP. Just kept this, to follow the style of kernel
documentation for functions.

Roberto

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-16  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10 16:59 [PATCH v10 0/9] bpf: Add kfuncs for PKCS#7 signature verification Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] bpf: Allow kfuncs to be used in LSM programs Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] btf: Handle dynamic pointer parameter in kfuncs Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] bpf: Export bpf_dynptr_get_size() Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] KEYS: Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h Roberto Sassu
2022-08-12  0:19   ` KP Singh
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() kfuncs Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 21:33   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-11  7:46     ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-11 12:02       ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-11 23:52         ` Daniel Müller
2022-08-12  8:11           ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-15 16:22             ` Daniel Müller
2022-08-12  0:49   ` KP Singh
2022-08-16  8:40     ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc Roberto Sassu
2022-08-12  0:54   ` KP Singh
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add additional tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() Roberto Sassu
2022-08-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7278db1e90de4c7bb669449e897d1946@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.