All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix cherry-pick/revert status when doing multiple commits
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:11:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <743b17ee-2c5b-be7e-70f3-76d0f9d0ff5e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230627224230.1951135-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>

Hi Jacob

This version looks good to me

Thanks for re-rolling

Phillip

On 27/06/2023 23:41, Jacob Keller wrote:
> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
> 
> The status report for an in-progress cherry-pick does not show the
> current commit if the cherry-pick happens as part of a series of
> multiple commits:
> 
>   $ git cherry-pick <commit1> <commit2>
>   < one of the cherry-picks fails to merge clean >
>   Cherry-pick currently in progress.
>    (run "git cherry-pick --continue" to continue)
>    (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
>    (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)
> 
>   $ git status
>   On branch <branch>
>   Your branch is ahead of '<upstream>' by 1 commit.
>     (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
> 
>   Cherry-pick currently in progress.
>     (run "git cherry-pick --continue" to continue)
>     (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
>     (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)
> 
> The show_cherry_pick_in_progress() function prints "Cherry-pick
> currently in progress". That function does have a more verbose print
> based on whether the cherry_pick_head_oid is null or not. If it is not
> null, then a more helpful message including which commit is actually
> being picked is displayed.
> 
> The introduction of the "Cherry-pick currently in progress" message
> comes from 4a72486de97b ("fix cherry-pick/revert status after commit",
> 2019-04-17). This commit modified wt_status_get_state() in order to
> detect that a cherry-pick was in progress even if the user has used `git
> commit` in the middle of the sequence.
> 
> The check used to detect this is the call to sequencer_get_last_command.
> If the sequencer indicates that the lass command was a REPLAY_PICK, then
> the state->cherry_pick_in_progress is set to 1 and the
> cherry_pick_head_oid is initialized to the null_oid. Similar behavior is
> done for the case of REPLAY_REVERT.
> 
> It happens that this call of sequencer_get_last_command will always
> report the action even if the user hasn't interrupted anything. Thus,
> during a range of cherry-picks or reverts, the cherry_pick_head_oid and
> revert_head_oid will always be overwritten and initialized to the null
> oid.
> 
> This results in status always displaying the terse message which does
> not include commit information.
> 
> Fix this by adding an additional check so that we do not re-initialize
> the cherry_pick_head_oid or revert_head_oid if we have already set the
> cherry_pick_in_progress or revert_in_progress bits. This ensures that
> git status will display the more helpful information when its available.
> Add a test case covering this behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> * add the missing test case that I had locally but forgot to squash in
> * use else if as suggested by Phillip
> 
>   t/t7512-status-help.sh | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   wt-status.c            |  4 ++--
>   2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/t/t7512-status-help.sh b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
> index 2f16d5787edf..c2ab8a444a83 100755
> --- a/t/t7512-status-help.sh
> +++ b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
> @@ -774,6 +774,28 @@ EOF
>   	test_cmp expected actual
>   '
>   
> +test_expect_success 'status when cherry-picking multiple commits' '
> +	git reset --hard cherry_branch &&
> +	test_when_finished "git cherry-pick --abort" &&
> +	test_must_fail git cherry-pick cherry_branch_second one_cherry &&
> +	TO_CHERRY_PICK=$(git rev-parse --short CHERRY_PICK_HEAD) &&
> +	cat >expected <<EOF &&
> +On branch cherry_branch
> +You are currently cherry-picking commit $TO_CHERRY_PICK.
> +  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
> +  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
> +  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)
> +
> +Unmerged paths:
> +  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
> +	both modified:   main.txt
> +
> +no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
> +EOF
> +	git status --untracked-files=no >actual &&
> +	test_cmp expected actual
> +'
> +
>   test_expect_success 'status when cherry-picking after committing conflict resolution' '
>   	git reset --hard cherry_branch &&
>   	test_when_finished "git cherry-pick --abort" &&
> diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
> index 068b76ef6d96..8d23ff8ced23 100644
> --- a/wt-status.c
> +++ b/wt-status.c
> @@ -1790,10 +1790,10 @@ void wt_status_get_state(struct repository *r,
>   		oidcpy(&state->revert_head_oid, &oid);
>   	}
>   	if (!sequencer_get_last_command(r, &action)) {
> -		if (action == REPLAY_PICK) {
> +		if (action == REPLAY_PICK && !state->cherry_pick_in_progress) {
>   			state->cherry_pick_in_progress = 1;
>   			oidcpy(&state->cherry_pick_head_oid, null_oid());
> -		} else {
> +		} else if (action == REPLAY_REVERT && !state->revert_in_progress) {
>   			state->revert_in_progress = 1;
>   			oidcpy(&state->revert_head_oid, null_oid());
>   		}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-27 22:41 [PATCH v2] fix cherry-pick/revert status when doing multiple commits Jacob Keller
2023-06-28 11:11 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2023-06-28 16:26   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=743b17ee-2c5b-be7e-70f3-76d0f9d0ff5e@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.