From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:38:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76454f39-8e41-e757-3a71-c85303c6257e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211008135332.19567-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
On 10/8/21 15:53, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Neil Brown raised concerns about callers of reclaim_throttle specifying
> a timeout value. The original timeout values to congestion_wait() were
> probably pulled out of thin air or copy&pasted from somewhere else.
> This patch centralises the timeout values and selects a timeout based
> on the reason for reclaim throttling. These figures are also pulled
> out of the same thin air but better values may be derived
>
> Running a workload that is throttling for inappropriate periods
> and tracing mm_vmscan_throttled can be used to pick a more appropriate
> value. Excessive throttling would pick a lower timeout where as
> excessive CPU usage in reclaim context would select a larger timeout.
> Ideally a large value would always be used and the wakeups would
> occur before a timeout but that requires careful testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-08 13:53 [PATCH v3 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim until some writeback completes if congested Mel Gorman
2021-10-13 15:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim and compaction when too may pages are isolated Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 8:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 11:56 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 12:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 13:03 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/writeback: Throttle based on page writeback instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/page_alloc: Remove the throttling logic from the page allocator Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:38 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/vmscan: Increase the timeout if page reclaim is not making progress Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/vmscan: Delay waking of tasks throttled on NOPROGRESS Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-19 9:01 [PATCH v4 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-19 9:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 1:06 ` NeilBrown
2021-10-22 8:12 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 [PATCH v5 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76454f39-8e41-e757-3a71-c85303c6257e@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.