From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] s390x: Define the PSW bits
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:11:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7daddc03-35ec-f376-c80a-a849f9e11714@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <489b43a4-6f71-71bf-b936-e4c94e52387b@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 873 bytes --]
On 11/28/19 3:36 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 28.11.19 13:46, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> Let's define the PSW bits explicitly, it will clarify their
>> usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 6 ++----
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't really see a reason to move these 4/5 defines to
> a separate header. Can you just keep them in arch_def.h and extend?
>
> (none of your other patches touch arch_bits.h - and it is somewhat a
> weird name. Where to put something new: arch_def.h or arch_bits.h? I
> would have understood "psw.h", but even that, I don't consider necessary)
>
On a related note:
I'd still like to split up the file soonish, maybe moving the functions
into a new file?
@Thomas/David: What's your opinion on that?
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-02 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-28 12:45 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/9] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/9] s390x: saving regs for interrupts Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] s390x: Define the PSW bits Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 14:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-28 19:16 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 19:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 13:04 ` Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 11:11 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-12-02 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-02 16:52 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] s390x: irq: make IRQ handler weak Pierre Morel
2019-11-29 12:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-02 10:41 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-02 16:55 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility Pierre Morel
2019-11-29 12:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 13:04 ` Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 11:13 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-02 17:03 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 14:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-02 17:33 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 14:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-02 17:53 ` Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 18:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-02 18:33 ` Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 19:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-03 8:43 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 14:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-02 17:55 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 14:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-02 18:18 ` Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 19:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-03 8:58 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 9/9] s390x: css: ping pong Pierre Morel
2019-12-02 15:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-02 18:25 ` Pierre Morel
2019-12-06 14:18 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7daddc03-35ec-f376-c80a-a849f9e11714@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.