All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Dan Moulding <dmoulding@me.com>
Cc: emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, johannes.berg@intel.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linuxwifi@intel.com,
	luciano.coelho@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5.5] iwlwifi: mvm: Do not require PHY_SKU NVM section for 3168 devices
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0ajx3r2.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211162450.2493-1-dmoulding@me.com> (Dan Moulding's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:24:50 -0700")

Dan Moulding <dmoulding@me.com> writes:

> This is just a friendly reminder that this patch has been submitted,
> for what looks like a fairly major regression in iwlwifi that impacts
> (as far as I can tell) *all* 3168 devices. The regression is in the
> v5.5.x series and was for a while back-ported to the stable trees, but
> luckily was noticed before the releases were made.
>
> There are at least a few bug reports for this regression:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206329
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/706810
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/7/811
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=252603
>
> The Gentoo maintainers have already applied this patch to their Linux
> sources and marked their bug report "fixed". But it would be really
> nice if we could get this regression fixed in the next stable v5.5.x
> release.

I'll queue this directly to wireless-drivers. Intel folks, are you ok
with this?

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-12 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28  9:31 [PATCH v2 5.5] iwlwifi: mvm: Do not require PHY_SKU NVM section for 3168 devices Dan Moulding
2020-02-11 16:24 ` Dan Moulding
2020-02-12 14:46   ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-02-13  7:39     ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2020-03-04  9:06       ` Luciano Coelho
2020-03-04 15:58         ` Dan Moulding
2020-02-13 10:03 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d0ajx3r2.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dmoulding@me.com \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.