All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yao Yuan <yuan.yao@intel.com>, Peng Dong <dongx.peng@intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Liu Jingqi <jingqi.liu@intel.com>,
	Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 10/21] mm: build separate zonelist for PMEM and DRAM node
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 19:39:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8ekk19s.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190107095753.7feee5fxjja5lt75@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>

Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 02:44:41PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> writes:
>>
>>> From: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
>>>
>>> When allocate page, DRAM and PMEM node should better not fall back to
>>> each other. This allows migration code to explicitly control which type
>>> of node to allocate pages from.
>>>
>>> With this patch, PMEM NUMA node can only be used in 2 ways:
>>> - migrate in and out
>>> - numactl
>>
>>Can we achieve this using nodemask? That way we don't tag nodes with
>>different properties such as DRAM/PMEM. We can then give the
>>flexibilility to the device init code to add the new memory nodes to
>>the right nodemask
>
> Aneesh, in patch 2 we did create nodemask numa_nodes_pmem and
> numa_nodes_dram. What's your supposed way of "using nodemask"?
>

IIUC the patch is to avoid allocation from PMEM nodes and the way you
achieve it is by checking if (is_node_pmem(n)). We already have
abstractness to avoid allocation from a node using node mask. I was
wondering whether we can do the equivalent of above using that.

ie, __next_zone_zonelist can do zref_in_nodemask(z,
default_exclude_nodemask)) and decide whether to use the specific zone
or not.

That way we don't add special code like 

+	PGDAT_DRAM,			/* Volatile DRAM memory node */
+	PGDAT_PMEM,			/* Persistent memory node */

The reason is that there could be other device memory that would want to
get excluded from that default allocation like you are doing for PMEM

-aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-07 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-26 13:14 [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] PMEM NUMA node and hotness accounting/migration Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 01/21] e820: cheat PMEM as DRAM Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-27  3:41   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-27  4:11     ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-27  5:13       ` Dan Williams
2018-12-27  5:13         ` Dan Williams
2018-12-27 19:32         ` Yang Shi
2018-12-27 19:32           ` Yang Shi
2018-12-28  3:27           ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/21] acpi/numa: memorize NUMA node type from SRAT table Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 03/21] x86/numa_emulation: fix fake NUMA in uniform case Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 04/21] x86/numa_emulation: pass numa node type to fake nodes Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 05/21] mmzone: new pgdat flags for DRAM and PMEM Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 06/21] x86,numa: update numa node type Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 07/21] mm: export node type {pmem|dram} under /sys/bus/node Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 08/21] mm: introduce and export pgdat peer_node Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-27 20:07   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-12-27 20:07     ` Christopher Lameter
2018-12-28  2:31     ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 09/21] mm: avoid duplicate peer target node Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 10/21] mm: build separate zonelist for PMEM and DRAM node Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2019-01-01  9:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-01  9:14     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-07  9:57     ` Fengguang Wu
2019-01-07 14:09       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 11/21] kvm: allocate page table pages from DRAM Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2019-01-01  9:23   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-01  9:23     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-02  0:59     ` Yuan Yao
2019-01-02 16:47   ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-07 10:21     ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 12/21] x86/pgtable: " Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 13/21] x86/pgtable: dont check PMD accessed bit Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:14   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 14/21] kvm: register in mm_struct Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2019-02-02  6:57   ` Peter Xu
2019-02-02 10:50     ` Fengguang Wu
2019-02-04 10:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 15/21] ept-idle: EPT walk for virtual machine Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 16/21] mm-idle: mm_walk for normal task Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 17/21] proc: introduce /proc/PID/idle_pages Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 18/21] kvm-ept-idle: enable module Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 19/21] mm/migrate.c: add move_pages(MPOL_MF_SW_YOUNG) flag Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 20/21] mm/vmscan.c: migrate anon DRAM pages to PMEM node Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 21/21] mm/vmscan.c: shrink anon list if can migrate to PMEM Fengguang Wu
2018-12-26 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-27 20:31 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] PMEM NUMA node and hotness accounting/migration Michal Hocko
2018-12-28  5:08   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-28  8:41     ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-28  9:42       ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-28 12:15         ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-28 13:15           ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-28 13:15             ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-28 19:46             ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-28 13:31           ` Fengguang Wu
2018-12-28 18:28             ` Yang Shi
2018-12-28 18:28               ` Yang Shi
2018-12-28 19:52             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-02 12:21               ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-02 12:21                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-08 14:52                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-10 15:53                   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 15:53                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 16:42                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-10 17:42                       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 17:42                         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 18:26                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-10 18:26                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-28 17:42                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-28 17:42                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-29  2:00                   ` Fengguang Wu
2019-01-03 10:57               ` Mel Gorman
2019-01-10 16:25               ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 16:25                 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 16:50                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-10 18:02                   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-10 18:02                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-02 18:12       ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-08 14:53         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h8ekk19s.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dongx.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=fan.du@intel.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yuan.yao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.