From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nagaraju, Vathsala" <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Patil, Deepti" <deepti.patil@intel.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: set CHICKEN_TRANS for psr2
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:12:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h94w4wid.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVU7+u__s1ALm5jwpm4c91eBxz84Kp+c29Aj=fpy9Y4qUJPnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Jani Nikula
> <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This and all the remaining patches on this series (6,7,8 and 9) got
>>> merged to dinq.
>>
>> Given that this patch series was not properly sent as a thread, I don't
>> think our CI ran it as a whole, and it should not have been pushed
>> before that.
>
> I assumed "[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for enable psr2 for
> idle_screen on y-cordinate panel"
> was enough, giving the patches haven't drastically changed after.
The idea is to test the code that gets pushed...
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 15:22 [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: set CHICKEN_TRANS for psr2 vathsala nagaraju
2017-01-12 19:01 ` vathsala nagaraju
2017-01-12 20:12 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-01-13 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2017-01-16 10:04 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-17 17:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-01-18 8:12 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-01-18 21:50 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-01-19 9:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-06 18:58 vathsala nagaraju
2017-01-07 18:12 ` vathsala nagaraju
2017-01-07 19:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h94w4wid.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=deepti.patil@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.