Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: set qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator for wifi

From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@freebox.fr>,
	 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	 Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
	 ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	 DT <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	 MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pierre-Hugues Husson <phhusson@freebox.fr>,
	 Arnaud Vrac <avrac@freebox.fr>,
	 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	 Jami Kettunen <jamipkettunen@gmail.com>,
	 Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	 Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: set qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator for wifi
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:39:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il05s8ft.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425-monopoly-barn-45608dae0996@spud> (Conor Dooley's message of "Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:02:56 +0100")

Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:42:16PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@freebox.fr> writes:
>> 
>> > On 25/04/2024 11:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >
>> >> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> >> 
>> >>> Do you prefer:
>> >>>
>> >>> Option A = never waiting for the MSA_READY indicator for ANYONE
>> >>> Option B = not waiting for the MSA_READY indicator when
>> >>> qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator is defined
>> >>> Option C = not waiting for the MSA_READY indicator for certain
>> >>> platforms (based on root compatible)
>> >>> Option D = some other solution not yet discussed
>> >> 
>> >> After firmware-N.bin solution didn't work (sorry about that!) my
>> >> preference is option B.
>> >
>> > Actually, Option B is this patch series.
>> > Could you formally review it?
>> 
>> I'm happy with this series and would take it to ath.git, just need an
>> ack from DT maintainers:
>
> As far as I can tell, Krzysztof wanted a commit message update for
> 1/3.

That's my understanding as well, I assume Marc will submit v3. I marked
this patchset as 'Changes Requested' in patchwork.

> Usually this dts patch would go via the qcom dts tree, so presumably
> there's a need for an Ack from Bjorn or Konrad?

Thanks pointing this out. What I meant to say earlier that I'm happy to
take patches 1-2 to ath.git but I prefer that patch 3 goes via qcom dts
tree.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches