All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>,
	Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:23:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtu2fk59.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409101409.GA2633526@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> That leaves us with just 2 options for now.
> 1. Update numa_mem later and only update numa_node here.
> - Over a longer period of time, this would be more confusing since we
> may lose track of why we are splitting the set of numa_node and numa_mem.
>
> or
> 2. Use my earlier patch.
>
> My choice would be to go with my earlier patch.
> Please do let me know your thoughts on the same.

OK, agreed. Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-13 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 15:42 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-01 22:51 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-02  3:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-07 12:19     ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-07 16:49       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-07 19:46         ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-08 11:11           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-08 20:00             ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-09 10:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-13 12:23     ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2021-04-13 12:25 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-19  4:00 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mtu2fk59.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com \
    --cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.