Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] 9pfs: fsdev: use error_report() instead of fprintf(stderr)

From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] 9pfs: fsdev: use error_report() instead of fprintf(stderr)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:19:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpr5ep7w.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119122837.32bb9840@bahia.huguette.org> (Greg Kurz's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:28:37 +0100")

Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:39:28 +0100
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This series moves all the 9pfs/fsdev code to use error_report(), with the
>> > notable exception of virtfs-proxy-helper, which doesn't need it.
>> >
>> > Markus,
>> >
>> > Should this patches go through your tree ? Or can they go through my 9p tree
>> > if you ack them ?  
>> 
>> It can certainly go through your tree!
>> 
>> My tree is meant for crosscutting error work.  I also offer it
>> maintainers who prefer to leave the pull request to me.
>> 
>> PATCH 1 could use a bit of polish, and I encourage you to respin.  But
>> it's not wrong, therefore
>> 
>> Series
>> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> 
>
> Thanks Markus !
>
> I've respun the series with your suggestions. Is it expected I repost to
> qemu-devel before doing a pull request ?

Maintainers sometimes skip posting trivially revised patches for
additional review before doing a pull request.  Posting them is never
wrong, though.

When in doubt, post :)