From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: treding@nvidia.com, bbasu@nvidia.com, amiettinen@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 18:59:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c26f493-76d4-086e-c353-2f60a4ef7a72@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901164113.29139-3-sumitg@nvidia.com>
On 01/09/2023 17:41, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> Use reference clock count based loop instead of "udelay()" for
> sampling of counters to improve the accuracy of re-generated CPU
> frequency. "udelay()" internally calls "WFE" which stops the
> counters and results in bigger delta between the last set freq
> and the re-generated value from counters. The counter sampling
> window used in loop is the minimum number of reference clock
> cycles which is known to give a stable value of CPU frequency.
> The change also helps to reduce the sampling window from "500us"
> to "<50us".
>
> Suggested-by: Antti Miettinen <amiettinen@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
> ---
Same here.
Jon
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 16:41 [Patch v2 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver Sumit Gupta
2023-09-01 16:41 ` [Patch v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls Sumit Gupta
2023-09-01 17:58 ` Jon Hunter
2023-09-01 19:51 ` Sumit Gupta
2023-09-28 7:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-09-29 14:17 ` Sumit Gupta
2023-10-03 5:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-04 14:11 ` Sumit Gupta
2023-09-01 16:41 ` [Patch v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay Sumit Gupta
2023-09-01 17:59 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2023-09-01 19:53 ` Sumit Gupta
2023-09-19 11:28 ` [Patch v2 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c26f493-76d4-086e-c353-2f60a4ef7a72@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=amiettinen@nvidia.com \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.