RE: Implement generic double fault generation mechanism

From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
To: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Implement generic double fault generation mechanism
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:46:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A8280501A81A8F02@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A8280501A81A8EFE@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Dong, Eddie wrote:
> ction will be re-executed.
>>> 
>>> Do you want it to be covered for now? For exception, it is easy but
>>> for IRQ, it needs to be pushed back.
>>> 
>> Yes I want it to be covered now otherwise any serial exception
>> generates flood of "Exception happens serially" messages. This
>> function does not handle IRQ so no problem there.
> 
> But we soon will let this function cove IRQ as well per SDM.
> Why not do that a little bit later?
> 
> BTW, this issue exist in original code as well.
> 
> Eddie

Actually this is already addressed in current patch too: Just keep the former exception. If you mean the prink should be removed, I am fine. 
BTW, this case doesn't happen in reality.

Thx, eddie