All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 5/8] drm/msm: update cursors asynchronously through atomic
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 11:24:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <988c8aa3-8b75-bae5-3322-f15dfa29e0b5@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517113528.n7qq2wndv2mcqqi2@phenom.ffwll.local>



On 05/17/2017 05:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:56:25AM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/16/2017 08:14 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/13/2017 12:40 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support to async updates of cursors by using the new atomic
>>>> interface for that. Basically what this commit does is do what
>>>> mdp5_update_cursor_plane_legacy() did but through atomic.
>>>
>>> Works well on DB820c (which has a APQ8096 SoC).
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Actually, after some more thorough testing, I found one issue, mentioned below.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> v3: move size checks back to drivers (Ville Syrjälä)
>>>>
>>>> v2: move fb setting to core and use new state (Eric Anholt)
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c | 151 +++++++++++++-----------------
>>>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c
>>>> index a38c5fe..07106c1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c
>>>> @@ -33,15 +33,6 @@ static int mdp5_plane_mode_set(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>>           struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>>>           struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dest);
>>>>   -static int mdp5_update_cursor_plane_legacy(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>> -        struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>> -        struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>>> -        int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
>>>> -        unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
>>>> -        uint32_t src_x, uint32_t src_y,
>>>> -        uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h,
>>>> -        struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx);
>>>> -
>>>>   static struct mdp5_kms *get_kms(struct drm_plane *plane)
>>>>   {
>>>>       struct msm_drm_private *priv = plane->dev->dev_private;
>>>> @@ -257,7 +248,7 @@ static const struct drm_plane_funcs mdp5_plane_funcs = {
>>>>   };
>>>>     static const struct drm_plane_funcs mdp5_cursor_plane_funcs = {
>>>> -        .update_plane = mdp5_update_cursor_plane_legacy,
>>>> +        .update_plane = drm_atomic_helper_update_plane,
>>>>           .disable_plane = drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane,
>>>>           .destroy = mdp5_plane_destroy,
>>>>           .set_property = drm_atomic_helper_plane_set_property,
>>>> @@ -484,11 +475,73 @@ static void mdp5_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>>       }
>>>>   }
>>>>   +static int mdp5_plane_atomic_async_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>> +                     struct drm_plane_state *state)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct mdp5_plane_state *mdp5_state = to_mdp5_plane_state(state);
>>>> +    struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>>>> +
>>>> +    crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state->state,
>>>> +                            state->crtc);
>>
>> I see a kernel splat here (a NULL pointer dereference). The async_check
>> function assumes that there is always going to be a plane_state->crtc
>> available. This doesn't seem to be the case at least in the
>> drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane() path. Moving the check to set
>> legacy_cursor_update after calling __drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane()
>> seems to fix the issue. Do you think it's a legit fix?
>
> Yes, plane_state->crtc == NULL is what happens when disabling a plane. I
> guess simplest would be to just not handle this for the async cursor
> helpers.

Okay. There is actually a check for (crtc != NULL) in drm_atomic_async_check().
The problem with it is that it is referring to the old plane state
(i.e plane->state->crtc) instead of the new plane state (i.e, plane_state->crtc).
Changing this fixes the issue without the need to touch
drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane().

>
> I thought we've had tons of igts to test this ...
>
>> One more point w.r.t msm driver is that we don't use the default
>> drm_atomic_helper_commit() for our atomic_commit op. So I had to
>> call drm_atomic_helper_async_commit() from our atomic_commit
>> implementation
>> (i.e, in msm_atomic_commit in drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_atomic.c)
>
> Would be great to fix that - msm predates the nonblocking support in the
> commit helper, but since this is fixed there's no reason anymore for
> driver-private commit functions. Or at least there shouldn't be, for
> almost all drivers. You can stuff all your hw commit logic into
> atomic_commit_tail.

Cool. I'll try to to convert to the commit helper funcs.

Thanks,
Archit

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-19  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-12 19:10 [RFC v3 0/8] drm/atomic: add async plane update Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 1/8] drm/atomic: initial support for asynchronous " Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 2/8] drm/virtio: support async cursor updates Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 3/8] drm/i915: update cursors asynchronously through atomic Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 4/8] drm/i915: remove intel_cursor_plane_funcs Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 5/8] drm/msm: update cursors asynchronously through atomic Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-16 14:44   ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-17  5:26     ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-17 11:35       ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-19  5:54         ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 6/8] drm/msm: remove mdp5_cursor_plane_funcs Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-16 14:46   ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 7/8] drm/vc4: update cursors asynchronously through atomic Gustavo Padovan
2017-05-18 22:54   ` Robert Foss
2017-05-12 19:10 ` [RFC v3 8/8] drm/atomic: add ASYNC_UPDATE flag to the Atomic IOCTL Gustavo Padovan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=988c8aa3-8b75-bae5-3322-f15dfa29e0b5@codeaurora.org \
    --to=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.