All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] ebpf-docs: Improve English readability
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:19:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+Vrm6g7FZ-PaqLkGfVzN+z8HBTq6Q3MmvR88J6H8cHPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR21MB3440986863D2893E382BDD02A35A9@DM4PR21MB3440.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 8:56 AM Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Also worth noting that Quentin has a script that I believe parses the appendix
> and uses it to generate a validator for ebpf programs.  (Which also
> helps validate the appendix).

The last thing I want to see is a document becoming a description
of the code.
We've always been doing it the other way around.
The documentation can live next to the code and docs automatically
generated from .h or .c files.
Doing the other way around sooner or later will be a disaster.
Imagine a typo in instruction-set.rst.
What should we do next? Fix a typo and say, look, the code
behaves differently, so we're fixing the doc.
If so, there is close to zero reason to add hex to the doc,
since it's not an authoritative answer.
On the other hand if instruction-set.rst is the source of
the truth then the code would have to change, which we obviously
cannot do. So let's not get us into the corner with
such tables.

> Dave
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Thaler
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 8:55 AM
> > To: 'Alexei Starovoitov' <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
> > Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 11/15] ebpf-docs: Improve English readability
> >
> > > > I found it very helpful in verifying that the Appendix table was
> > > > correct, and providing a correlation to the text here that shows the
> > > > construction of the value.  So I'd like to keep them.
> > >
> > > I think that means that the appendix table shouldn't be there either.
> > > I'd like to avoid both.
> >
> > I've heard from multiple people with different affiliations that the appendix
> > is the most useful part of the document, and what they wanted to see
> > added.  So I added by popular request.

These people should speak up then.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-04 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-27 18:59 [PATCH 01/15] ebpf-docs: Move legacy packet instructions to a separate file dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 02/15] ebpf-docs: Linux byteswap note dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 03/15] ebpf-docs: Move Clang notes to a separate file dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 04/15] ebpf-docs: Add Clang note about BPF_ALU dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 05/15] ebpf-docs: Add TOC and fix formatting dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 06/15] ebpf-docs: Use standard type convention in standard doc dthaler1968
2022-09-30 20:49   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 07/15] ebpf-docs: Fix modulo zero, division by zero, overflow, and underflow dthaler1968
2022-09-30 20:52   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-30 21:54     ` Dave Thaler
2022-09-30 21:59       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-30 22:41         ` Dave Thaler
2022-09-30 23:41           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-04 16:36             ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-04 17:24               ` div_k. Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-04 18:23                 ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-04 18:34                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-09-29 21:03           ` Signed modulo operations Dave Thaler
2023-09-29 21:03             ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2023-09-30  6:07             ` Carsten Bormann
2023-09-30  6:07               ` Carsten Bormann
2023-09-30 14:48             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-09-30 14:48               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-10-02 13:19               ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 08/15] ebpf-docs: Use consistent names for the same field dthaler1968
2022-09-30 20:57   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-04 14:44     ` Dave Thaler
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 09/15] ebpf-docs: Explain helper functions dthaler1968
2022-09-30 22:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-30 23:01     ` Dave Thaler
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 10/15] ebpf-docs: Add appendix of all opcodes in order dthaler1968
2022-09-30 22:02   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-30 22:43     ` Dave Thaler
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 11/15] ebpf-docs: Improve English readability dthaler1968
2022-09-30 22:16   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-04 14:32     ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-04 15:38       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-04 15:55         ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-04 15:56           ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-04 16:19             ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2022-10-04 16:41               ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-04 16:54                 ` Dave Thaler
2022-10-06 20:44                   ` Jim Harris
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 12/15] ebpf-docs: Add Linux note about register calling convention dthaler1968
2022-09-30 22:17   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 13/15] ebpf-docs: Add extended 64-bit immediate instructions dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 14/15] ebpf-docs: Add extended call instructions dthaler1968
2022-09-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 15/15] ebpf-docs: Add note about invalid instruction dthaler1968
2022-09-30 22:21   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-30 20:50 ` [PATCH 01/15] ebpf-docs: Move legacy packet instructions to a separate file patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAADnVQ+Vrm6g7FZ-PaqLkGfVzN+z8HBTq6Q3MmvR88J6H8cHPw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dthaler@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.