All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem.
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 13:48:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLYrP0P5CZj1domV3n3oHJsDYRbbk+1tym223-Z=Tk54A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217003152.48334-9-haoluo@google.com>

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:32 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> wrote:
>
> Some helper functions may modify its arguments, for example,
> bpf_d_path, bpf_get_stack etc. Previously, their argument types
> were marked as ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, which is compatible with read-only
> mem types, such as PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF. Therefore it's legitimate
> to modify a read-only memory by passing it into one of such helper
> functions.

I've added ", but technically incorrect" to the above sentence.
Otherwise it sounds like it was an ok thing to do.
I've considered adding a set of Fixes tag, but there would be too many
and it's a laborious task to look through all such helpers just
to beautify the commit log. This patch set isn't going to
be backported anyway due to complexity.

Please add a test to make sure that bpf_d_path on rdonly buf
is rejected.

Thank you very much for doing this work.
It's a great improvement to the verifier type handling.

There is a concern that generality of flags may cause
a regression, but no amount of code review will reveal that.
Please watch out for strange verifier issues.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-18 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17  0:31 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/9] Introduce composable bpf types Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: Introduce composable reg, ret and arg types Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: Replace ARG_XXX_OR_NULL with ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf: Replace RET_XXX_OR_NULL with RET_XXX " Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: Replace PTR_TO_XXX_OR_NULL with PTR_TO_XXX " Hao Luo
2021-12-18 21:48   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: Convert PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to composable types Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM Hao Luo
2021-12-18 21:48   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem Hao Luo
2021-12-18 21:48   ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2021-12-20 20:14     ` Hao Luo
2021-12-17  0:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] bpf/selftests: Test PTR_TO_RDONLY_MEM Hao Luo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAADnVQLYrP0P5CZj1domV3n3oHJsDYRbbk+1tym223-Z=Tk54A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.