From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat()
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:20:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEg-Je8UCV6kFdXJoyH3B78sraYCXscTmQQiPHjkPvzt5g1Wpw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415182909.GK4332@42.do-not-panic.com>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:29 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:17:58PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > There's a lot of larger things that need to
> > be addressed in general to support the volume approach inside file systems
> > that is going to require a lot of work inside of VFS. If you feel like
> > tackling that work and then wiring up btrfs by all means have at it, but I'm
> > not seeing a urgent need to address this. Thanks,
>
> That's precisely what I what I want to hear me about. Things like this.
> Would btrfs be the ony user of volumes inside filesystem? Jeff had
> mentioned before this could also allow namespaces per volumes, and this
> might be a desirable feature.
>
> What else?
Wouldn't this be useful for union filesystems like OverlayFS? Or other
filesystems that support nested filesystems like bcachefs?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-15 2:58 [RFC v3 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat() Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-15 2:58 ` [RFC v3 1/2] fs/super.c: add new super block sub devices super_block_dev Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-15 2:58 ` [RFC v3 2/2] btrfs: use the new VFS super_block_dev Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-15 9:29 ` [RFC v3 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat() Al Viro
2014-08-17 23:41 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-23 22:31 ` Jeff Mahoney
2021-04-15 17:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-04-15 18:17 ` Josef Bacik
2021-04-15 18:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-04-16 17:20 ` Neal Gompa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEg-Je8UCV6kFdXJoyH3B78sraYCXscTmQQiPHjkPvzt5g1Wpw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ngompa13@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.