Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix dpm_list ordering issue due to fw_devlink optimization

From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix dpm_list ordering issue due to fw_devlink optimization
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 10:36:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx-dcvsWDJPbM_c1O4ScJmPu97+WWRkygmF1g-grdAha9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW+dqCCqKjtxgZAAG-sFiMpbsEs_GoVGeKq6__A7EDBxg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:16 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:56 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:43 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > > When commit 93d2e4322aa7 ("of: platform: Batch fwnode parsing when
> > > adding all top level devices") enabled batch processing of fw_devlink to
> > > optimize the parsing time, it caused a suspend/resume regression due to
> > > the use of deferred probing early on at boot.
> > >
> > > This series fixes the regression by avoiding the use of deferred probing
> > > when optimizing fw_devlink parsing.
> > >
> > > Saravana Kannan (3):
> > >   driver core: Don't do deferred probe in parallel with kernel_init
> > >     thread
> > >   driver core: Rename dev_links_info.defer_sync to defer_hook
> > >   driver core: Avoid deferred probe due to fw_devlink_pause/resume()
> > >
> > >  drivers/base/base.h    |  1 -
> > >  drivers/base/core.c    | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  drivers/base/dd.c      |  5 -----
> > >  include/linux/device.h |  5 +++--
> > >  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Geert, any chance to test this series on top of 5.8-rc?  It is
> > expected to fix the suspend/resume regression reported by you.
>
> Sorry, I had completely forgotten I hadn't tested this iteration of
> the fix(es) yet. Thanks for the reminder!
>
> Works fine when applied on top of v5.8-rc4.
> Tested on r8a7740/armadillo, sh73a0/kzm9g, r8a7791/koelsch,
>  and r8a77951/salvator-xs.
>
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Great! Thanks!

-Saravana