All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] ksmbd: use ksmbd_req_buf_next() in ksmbd_smb2_check_message()
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:43:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mukpkfuf951rVC97EBA8KLVPc3chF2+33Ms31uR_ty5dg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84fca1c3-2ee2-2a13-d367-6878b56f200a@samba.org>

Typically kernel style encourages even a brief description in all
changesets (even trivial ones) e.g.

"Simplifies message parsing slightly.  No change in behavior"

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:29 PM Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org> wrote:
>
> Am 03.10.21 um 02:59 schrieb Namjae Jeon:
> > 2021-10-02 22:12 GMT+09:00, Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>:
> >> No change in behaviour.
> > It is better to add patch subject here if there is nothing to write
> > patch description.
> > i.e. "Use ksmbd_req_buf_next() in ksmbd_smb2_check_message()"
> See the mail subject, that's the patch subject.
>
> In Samba we often help reviewers reviewing large patchsets that may
> include a lot of small preparational/cleanup patches with a sentence
> like "No change in behaviour" to give a hint which patches are critical
> and need extra care when reviewing (ie all others) and which may not
> require this.
>
> -slow
>
> --
> Ralph Boehme, Samba Team                 https://samba.org/
> SerNet Samba Team Lead      https://sernet.de/en/team-samba



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-02 13:11 [PATCH v6 00/14] Buffer validation patches Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:11 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] ksmbd: add the check to vaildate if stream protocol length exceeds maximum value Ralph Boehme
2021-10-03  1:18   ` Namjae Jeon
2021-10-05  4:24     ` Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] ksmbd: add validation in smb2_ioctl Ralph Boehme
2021-10-03  1:21   ` Namjae Jeon
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] ksmbd: check strictly data area in ksmbd_smb2_check_message() Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] ksmbd: remove the leftover of smb2.0 dialect support Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] ksmbd: use ksmbd_req_buf_next() in ksmbd_verify_smb_message() Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] ksmbd: check buffer is big enough to access the ProtocolId field Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] ksmbd: use ksmbd_req_buf_next() in ksmbd_smb2_check_message() Ralph Boehme
2021-10-03  0:59   ` Namjae Jeon
2021-10-05  4:28     ` Ralph Boehme
2021-10-05 18:43       ` Steve French [this message]
2021-10-05 19:28         ` Ralph Boehme
2021-10-05 20:20           ` Steve French
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] ksmbd: use ksmbd_smb2_cur_pdu_buflen() " Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] ksmbd: check PDU len is at least header plus body size " Ralph Boehme
2021-10-03  1:11   ` Namjae Jeon
2021-10-05  4:32     ` Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] ksmdb: use cmd helper variable in smb2_get_ksmbd_tcon() Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] ksmdb: make smb2_get_ksmbd_tcon() callable with chained PDUs Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] ksmbd: make smb2_check_user_session() callable for compound PDUs Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] ksmdb: move session and tcon validation to ksmbd_smb2_check_message() Ralph Boehme
2021-10-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] ksmdb: validate credit charge after validating SMB2 PDU body size Ralph Boehme

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAH2r5mukpkfuf951rVC97EBA8KLVPc3chF2+33Ms31uR_ty5dg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=slow@samba.org \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.