Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags

From: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	 ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	Tim Van Patten <timvp@google.com>,
	 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"jingle.wu" <jingle.wu@emc.com.tw>,
	 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	 Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev,  Alexis Savery <asavery@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:36:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHQZ30D-vBHQG9tDXy_upKHzfFMA9ttUT72K4hqKNS+CtEek3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQZ30D0NmVytkmiVYYZdGMEOChsO93hYRrG6SNbFiRO4S=YGA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:53 AM Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 10:56 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 7:55 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 08:42:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:13:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:22 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > I think that patches [5-8/13] from this series are significant
> > > > > framework changes, so it would make sense to route them via the ACPI
> > > > > tree.
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is fine with everybody, I will queue them up for merging into
> > > > > 6.1 (probably in the second half of the upcoming merge window).
> > > >
> > > > I believe it's fine from GPIO ACPI perspective (there shouldn't be conflict,
> > > > but if you wish you always may take this PR [1] to your tree (it's already in
> > > > GPIO tree pending v6.1), it may be considered as immutable tag.
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/Yym%2Fj+Y9MBOIhWtK@black.fi.intel.com/
> > >
> > > Yeah, having an immutable branch hanging off 6.0-rcN would be awesome -
> > > I could pull it and this would avoid any potential conflicts later.
> >
> > This material is in the mainline now, but the branch is still there in
> > case you need it:
> >
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
> >  acpi-wakeup
> >
> > It won't be necessary any more after 6.1-rc1 is out, though, I suppose.
>

>
> Awesome, thanks for merging in the ACPI patches!

Dmitry,
 What are the next steps to getting the I2C patches landed? Should I
push out a new series that's rebased on 6.1-rc1?