All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, Markus Boehme <markubo@amazon.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/damon: suppress compiler warnings for huge_count_read_write
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 17:55:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJj2-QGUsqx8uRTamv7Hbw_-FRJOtrEnX6=fGEseZDJEtcnOaw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220504184537.130085-1-sj@kernel.org>

Hi Shuah,

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:45 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Yuanchu,
>
> On Wed, 4 May 2022 18:29:08 +0000 Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com> wrote:
>
> > The test case added in commit db7a347b26fe ("mm/damon/dbgfs:
> > use '__GFP_NOWARN' for user-specified size buffer allocation")
> > intentionally writes and reads with a large count to cause
> > allocation failure and check for kernel warnings. We suppress
> > the compiler warnings for these calls as they work as intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>
> > ---
>
> It would be a good practice to mention the changes from the previous version of
> this patch here[1].
>
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
>
> >  tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c
> > index ad7a6b4cf338..91bd80c75cd9 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
> >  /*
> >   * Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> >   */
> > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow"
> > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overread"
>
> I agree that this must be the cleaner way than v2.  But, I get below warning
> after applying this:
>
>     $ sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests/damon run_tests
>     make: Entering directory '/home/sjpark/linux/tools/testing/selftests/damon'
>     gcc     huge_count_read_write.c  -o /home/sjpark/linux/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write
>     huge_count_read_write.c:6:32: warning: unknown option after ‘#pragma GCC diagnostic’ kind [-Wpragmas]
>         6 | #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overread"
>           |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> My gcc version is:
>
>     $ gcc --version
>     gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) 9.4.0

    $ gcc --version
    gcc (Debian 11.2.0-16+build1) 11.2.0

I believe this is a new warning for gcc-11 [1], and somewhat unfortunate that
it results in a warning for gcc-9.4. So a patch that would resolve the test
warnings for gcc 11 would introduce a new warning for gcc 9, and vice versa.
What's the preferred solution here?

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-10.3.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html

Thanks,
Yuanchu

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 20:20 [PATCH RESEND] selftests/damon: add damon to selftests root Makefile Yuanchu Xie
2022-04-24 19:35 ` David Rientjes
2022-04-25 19:37   ` Shuah Khan
2022-04-25 20:03     ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-04  0:03       ` [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/damon: suppress compiler warnings for huge_count_read_write Yuanchu Xie
2022-05-04  0:03         ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/damon: add damon to selftests root Makefile Yuanchu Xie
2022-05-04  0:16           ` SeongJae Park
2022-05-04  4:50           ` David Rientjes
2022-05-04  0:11         ` [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/damon: suppress compiler warnings for huge_count_read_write SeongJae Park
2022-05-04 18:29           ` [PATCH v3] " Yuanchu Xie
2022-05-04 18:32             ` Yuanchu Xie
2022-05-04 18:45             ` SeongJae Park
2022-05-04 22:12               ` Yuanchu Xie
2022-05-17  1:07                 ` Yuanchu Xie
2022-05-17 16:04                   ` SeongJae Park
2022-05-25  0:55               ` Yuanchu Xie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJj2-QGUsqx8uRTamv7Hbw_-FRJOtrEnX6=fGEseZDJEtcnOaw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=markubo@amazon.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.