Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf annotate: Make annotation_options global (v1)

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf annotate: Make annotation_options global (v1)
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:41:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chXf7F9T+ToKXG+p+37-noMRtOmUr9sttBzEDOw8uJGgw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWN5Jwsf5dxqw0BJxpdu89FM54A-AtQpEqxeE7XLDx3mA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:14 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:52 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Em Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:50:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:59:02AM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:37 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Sgtm. My point wasn't to criticize, I think this is a good change, I
> > > > > > was just trying to imagine doing things in a way that could overall
> > > > > > reduce complexity
> > >
> > > > > Yep, thanks for your review.  Can I get your ACKs? :)
> > >
> > > > For the series:
> > > > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next.
> >
> >
> > Now trying to fix this:
> >
> >   CC      bench/numa.o
> >   CC      tests/hists_cumulate.o
> > ui/gtk/annotate.c: In function ‘symbol__gtk_annotate’:
> > ui/gtk/annotate.c:179:43: error: passing argument 3 of ‘symbol__annotate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >   179 |         err = symbol__annotate(ms, evsel, options, NULL);
> >       |                                           ^~~~~~~
> >       |                                           |
> >       |                                           struct annotation_options *
> > In file included from ui/gtk/annotate.c:5:
> > /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/util/annotate.h:376:36: note: expected ‘struct arch **’ but argument is of type ‘struct annotation_options *’
> >   376 |                      struct arch **parch);
> >       |                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> > ui/gtk/annotate.c:179:15: error: too many arguments to function ‘symbol__annotate’
> >   179 |         err = symbol__annotate(ms, evsel, options, NULL);
> >       |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/util/annotate.h:374:5: note: declared here
> >   374 | int symbol__annotate(struct map_symbol *ms,
> >       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >   CC      tests/python-use.o
> >   CC      trace/beauty/sockaddr.o
> >   CC      arch/x86/util/topdown.o
> > make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/build/Makefile.build:105: ui/gtk/annotate.o] Error 1
> > make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >   CC      arch/x86/util/machine.o
>
> Maybe a signal to remove the gtk support :-)

+1

Thanks,
Namhyung