Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] In-place module initialisation

From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de>
Cc: a.hindborg@samsung.com, alex.gaynor@gmail.com,
	aliceryhl@google.com,  benno.lossin@proton.me,
	bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	 gary@garyguo.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ojeda@kernel.org,  rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	walmeida@microsoft.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] In-place module initialisation
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:26:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nuRGUqi7JxdNpFPyTD2onNXvujZHk_5xuxwFSxqWh0xQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329140030.3989-1-kernel@valentinobst.de>

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 3:00 PM Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> wrote:
>
> If I interpret the docs correctly, previous patches in the same series are
> only implicitly considered as prerequisites for the marked patch if they
> are marked themselves:
>
>     "[...] you do not have to list patch1 as prerequisite of patch2
>     if you have already marked patch1 for stable inclusion."

Right, "Cc: stable" would be needed in both 1/5 and 2/5 (but one could
remove the "# ..." comments in that case, i.e. it seems simpler).

Cheers,
Miguel