From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Sparse Mailing-list <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cse: update PHI users when throwing away an instruction
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:33:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLGWGL-zn-WxArEDRBKjB-DGmpztsugi176o3JiRC5fnXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwPLDZZAEfP8xdFwqG2MG_79mbN_TjNTGRvyRq=WPWcSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The attached patch solves the dangling PHI nodes and does not seem to break
>> anything at first glance. It is probably not the most efficient solution,
>> but it might at least show where to look for the problem.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Hmm. From a quick look, looks fine to me. And checks the kernel, and
> does indeed get rid of the extraneous phi nodes in the test-case.
>
> Ack.
I applied both patches to sparse-llvm.git. Jeff, do they cure all loop
related issues?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-28 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-27 6:29 linearize bug? Jeff Garzik
2011-08-27 11:34 ` Kamil Dudka
2011-08-27 15:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 15:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-27 15:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 16:54 ` Kamil Dudka
2011-08-27 17:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-28 6:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-27 23:39 ` [PATCH] cse: update PHI users when throwing away an instruction Kamil Dudka
2011-08-28 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-28 6:32 ` Christopher Li
2011-08-28 6:33 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2011-08-28 8:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-27 22:07 ` linearize bug? Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOJsxLGWGL-zn-WxArEDRBKjB-DGmpztsugi176o3JiRC5fnXw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kdudka@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.