From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: fix timestamp limits
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:06:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxhMqYWYnXfXrzU7Qtv8xpR6k_tR9CFSo01NLZSvqBOxsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvASSszZoYOdX9dcffo0EUNGVe_b8RU3JTtn-tXr9O7eg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 5:48 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 8:30 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Overlayfs timestamp overflow limits should be inherrited from upper
> > filesystem.
> >
> > The current behavior, when overlayfs is over an underlying filesystem
> > that does not support post 2038 timestamps (e.g. xfs), is that overlayfs
> > overflows post 2038 timestamps instead of clamping them.
>
> How? Isn't the clamping supposed to happen in the underlying filesystem anyway?
>
Not sure if it is supposed to be it doesn't.
It happens in do_utimes() -> utimes_common()
clamping seems to happen when user sets the times,
so setting the overlay limits to those of upper fs seems
correct anyway.
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-11 7:30 [PATCH] ovl: fix timestamp limits Amir Goldstein
2019-11-11 22:31 ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-12 15:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-12 16:06 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2019-11-12 16:45 ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-12 16:49 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-11-12 16:56 ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-13 10:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-13 11:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxhMqYWYnXfXrzU7Qtv8xpR6k_tR9CFSo01NLZSvqBOxsw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.