Re: [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct

From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:03:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO_48GGJ6OC-bSNOOtqipuFL5LrMcbZUr1zZatQeZtSv-iMPMw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPj87rNjvxuxG2gw==S9+8sWLNfouqrG8gAYQio2xODQK16dEA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11 April 2017 at 12:38, Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11 April 2017 at 07:48, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> Note: As Daniel Stone mentioned in the announcement fd.o admins
>> started chatting with the communities their hosting, which includs the
>> X.org foundation board, to figure out how to fan out enforcement and
>> allow projects to run things on their own (with fd.o still as the
>> fallback).  So the details of enforcement (and appealing decisions)
>> might still change, but since this involves the board and lots more
>> people it'll take a while to get there. For now this is good enough I
>> think.
>
> All true.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
>
Thanks for this, Daniel!

Reviewed-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>

Best,
Sumit.

> Cheers,
> Daniel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx