All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ben Olson <ben.olson@intel.com>,
	Michal Biesek <michal.biesek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ndctl PATCH 10/10] daxctl: add --no-movable option for onlining memory
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:58:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hrxMFFK1wvCPkE1hMC8dyVFj3WUAzS4wgCBiuh0noa8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002234925.9190-11-vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Add a new '--no-movable' option to daxctl commands that may online
> memory - i.e. daxctl-reconfigure-device and daxctl-online-memory.
>
> Users may wish additional control over the state of the newly added
> memory. Retain the daxctl default for onlining memory as 'movable', but
> allow it to be overridden using the above option.
>
> Link: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/110
> Cc: Ben Olson <ben.olson@intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-online-memory.txt |  2 ++
>  .../daxctl/daxctl-reconfigure-device.txt      |  2 ++
>  Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt      | 10 ++++++
>  daxctl/device.c                               | 34 ++++++++++++++++---
>  4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-online-memory.txt b/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-online-memory.txt
> index 5ac1cbf..08b45cc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-online-memory.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-online-memory.txt
> @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ OPTIONS
>         more /dev/daxX.Y devices, where X is the region id and Y is the device
>         instance id.
>
> +include::movable-options.txt[]
> +
>  -u::
>  --human::
>         By default the command will output machine-friendly raw-integer
> diff --git a/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-reconfigure-device.txt b/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-reconfigure-device.txt
> index 4663529..cb28fed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-reconfigure-device.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/daxctl/daxctl-reconfigure-device.txt
> @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ OPTIONS
>         brought online automatically and immediately with the 'online_movable'
>         policy. Use this option to disable the automatic onlining behavior.
>
> +include::movable-options.txt[]
> +
>  -f::
>  --force::
>         When converting from "system-ram" mode to "devdax", it is expected
> diff --git a/Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt b/Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0ddd7b6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +-M::
> +--no-movable::

If --movable is the default I would expect -M to be associated with
--movable. Don't we otherwise get the --no-<option> handling for free
with boolean options? I otherwise don't think we need a short option
for the "no" case.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-18 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 23:49 [ndctl PATCH 00/10] fixes and movability for system-ram mode Vishal Verma
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 01/10] libdaxctl: refactor path construction in op_for_one_memblock() Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:43   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 02/10] libdaxctl: refactor memblock_is_online() checks Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:45   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 03/10] daxctl/device.c: fix json output omission for reconfigure-device Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:46   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 04/10] libdaxctl: add an API to determine if memory is movable Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:54   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-18 19:57     ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-10-18 20:40       ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 05/10] libdaxctl: allow memblock_in_dev() to return an error Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 19:15   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 06/10] daxctl: show a 'movable' attribute in device listings Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 19:16   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 07/10] daxctl: detect races when onlining memory blocks Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 19:26   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 08/10] Documentation: clarify memory movablity for reconfigure-device Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 20:46   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-18 20:50     ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 09/10] libdaxctl: add an API to online memory in a non-movable state Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 20:54   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 10/10] daxctl: add --no-movable option for onlining memory Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 20:58   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-10-18 21:04     ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-10-18 21:25       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hrxMFFK1wvCPkE1hMC8dyVFj3WUAzS4wgCBiuh0noa8w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.olson@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=michal.biesek@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.