All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3.1] cxl/mem: Map registers based on capabilities
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 17:30:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jrdGAtaoArXEQAH5XPrGQxCraiMD54UR_HfHmu3Z1iYw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604005036.4187184-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:51 PM <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>
> The information required to map registers based on capabilities is
> contained within the bars themselves.  This means the bar must be mapped
> to read the information needed and then unmapped to map the individual
> parts of the BAR based on capabilities.
>
> Change cxl_setup_device_regs() to return a new cxl_register_map, change
> the name to cxl_probe_device_regs().  Allocate and place
> cxl_register_maps on a list while processing all of the specified
> register blocks.
>
> After probing all the register blocks go back and map smaller registers
> blocks based on their capabilities and dispose of the cxl_register_maps.
>
> NOTE: pci_iomap() is not managed automatically via pcim_enable_device()
> so be careful to call pci_iounmap() correctly.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210528004922.3980613-4-ira.weiny@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> ---
> Changes for V3.1
>         Fix 0-day
>
> >> drivers/cxl/core.c:40:17: warning: variable 'register_block' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>       40 |   void __iomem *register_block;

Just a note for next time if you want to be friendly to "b4 am" using
maintainers. Roll the version and include the patch number in the
resend, i.e.: in this case: "[PATCH v4 3/5] cxl/mem: Map registers
based on capabilities". I was able to manually create a bundle in the
proper order on patchwork for the two "3.1" updates.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-06  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-28  0:49 [PATCH V3 0/5] Map register blocks individually ira.weiny
2021-05-28  0:49 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_decode_register_block() ira.weiny
2021-05-28  0:49 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] cxl/mem: Reserve all device regions at once ira.weiny
2021-05-28  0:49 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] cxl/mem: Map registers based on capabilities ira.weiny
2021-06-04  0:50   ` [PATCH V3.1] " ira.weiny
2021-06-06  0:30     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2021-05-28  0:49 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] cxl/mem: Reserve individual register block regions ira.weiny
2021-06-04  0:53   ` [PATCH V3.1] " ira.weiny
2021-05-28  0:49 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] cxl/pci: Add HDM decoder capabilities ira.weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4jrdGAtaoArXEQAH5XPrGQxCraiMD54UR_HfHmu3Z1iYw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.