From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using Key Locker instructions
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 22:20:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED9DFB96-B15E-493F-9089-4B69F5456532@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKLhc6HX9+JunQ/X@gmail.com>
On May 17, 2021, at 14:34, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:15:07PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> Included are methods for ECB, CBC, CTR, and XTS modes. They are not
>> compatible with other implementations as referencing an encrypted form
>> only.
>
> Your code uses the standard algorithm names like cbc(aes), which implies that it
> is compatible with the standard cbc(aes). So which is it -- compatible or not
> compatible -- and if it isn't compatible, what is the expected use case?
Yes, it provides AES-CBC functionality. Well, it was intended to avoid mixed
use of functions -- setkey(), decrypt(), and encrypt() -- from others.
Perhaps, rewrite this as:
Each method should not be used along with other implementations'. E.g., KL’s
setkey() output can’t be used to the input to the encrypt() method of AES-NI or
generic implementation.
Thanks,
Chang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-14 20:14 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] x86: Support Intel Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] x86/cpufeature: Enumerate Key Locker feature Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] x86/insn: Add Key Locker instructions to the opcode map Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] x86/cpu: Load Key Locker internal key at boot-time Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] x86/msr-index: Add MSRs for Key Locker internal key Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] x86/power: Restore Key Locker internal key from the ACPI S3/4 sleep states Chang S. Bae
2021-05-24 14:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] x86/cpu: Add a config option and a chicken bit for Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] selftests/x86: Test Key Locker internal key maintenance Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] crypto: x86/aes-ni - Improve error handling Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] crypto: x86/aes-ni - Refactor to prepare a new AES implementation Chang S. Bae
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using Key Locker instructions Chang S. Bae
2021-05-17 21:34 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-17 22:20 ` Bae, Chang Seok [this message]
2021-05-17 23:33 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-18 16:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] x86/cpu: Support the hardware randomization option for Key Locker internal key Chang S. Bae
2021-05-15 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] x86: Support Intel Key Locker Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-17 18:21 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-05-17 18:45 ` Dan Williams
2021-05-17 22:20 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-05-17 20:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-18 17:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-18 17:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-19 23:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-19 23:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-20 0:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-06 21:48 ` Bae, Chang Seok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED9DFB96-B15E-493F-9089-4B69F5456532@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.