RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: r7s9210-rza2mevb: Add support for RZ/A2M EVB

From: Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: r7s9210-rza2mevb: Add support for RZ/A2M EVB
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:10:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSAPR01MB1553FA10324223CBF4B774DC8AD30@OSAPR01MB1553.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdU6u8_qhe976afyY6Ydhu3byGZcBP=ipsvNowG3Ci=vGA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On Friday, November 30, 2018 1, Geert wrote:
> > So in our RZ/A BSP that I release to customers I would use this dual
> > license. You can see the exact same license in a number of dts files in
> > mainline.
> 
> Note that your file includes
> 
>     #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>     #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/r7s9210-pinctrl.h>
> 
> both of which are
> 
>    include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h:/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>    include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/r7s9210-pinctrl.h:/*
> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */

After I wrote that, I realized that we'll always have:
	#include "r7s9210.dtsi"
Which I have as GPL-2.0....so the dual license idea in pointless.

So to make things easy, I'll just drop the dual license thing and just 
use SPDX GPL-2.0

Chris