All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
To: matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	hao.wu@intel.com, russell.h.weight@intel.com,
	basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@intel.com, trix@redhat.com,
	mdf@kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tianfei.zhang@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	jirislaby@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
	niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, macro@orcam.me.uk,
	johan@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
	marpagan@redhat.com, bagasdotme@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support for DFHv1
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:13:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y74bSzUBLYH4cLDh@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2301101310150.815911@rhweight-WRK1>

On 2023-01-10 at 14:07:16 -0800, matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 04:30:28PM -0800, matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Version 1 of the Device Feature Header (DFH) definition adds
> > > functionality to the Device Feature List (DFL) bus.
> > > 
> > > A DFHv1 header may have one or more parameter blocks that
> > > further describes the HW to SW. Add support to the DFL bus
> > > to parse the MSI-X parameter.
> > > 
> > > The location of a feature's register set is explicitly
> > > described in DFHv1 and can be relative to the base of the DFHv1
> > > or an absolute address. Parse the location and pass the information
> > > to DFL driver.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > v10: change dfh_find_param to return size of parameter data in bytes
> > 
> > The problem that might occur with this approach is byte ordering.
> > When we have u64 items, we know that they all are placed in CPU
> > ordering by the bottom layer. What's the contract now? Can it be
> > a problematic? Please double check this (always keep in mind BE32
> > as most interesting case for u64/unsigned long representation and
> > other possible byte ordering outcomes).
> 
> A number of u64 items certainly states explicit alignment of the memory, but
> I think byte ordering is a different issue.
> 
> The bottom layer, by design, is still enforcing a number u64 items under the
> hood. So the contract has not changed. Changing units of size from u64s to
> bytes was suggested to match the general practice of size of memory being in
> bytes. I think the suggestion was made because the return type for
> dfh_find_param() changed from u64* to void* in version 9, when indirectly
> returning the size of the parameter data was introduced.  So a void * with a
> size in bytes makes sense. On the other hand, returning a u64 * is a more
> precise reflection of the data alignment. I think the API should be as

I prefer (void *) + bytes. The properties in the parameter block are not
guarateed to be u64 for each, e.g. the REG_LAYOUT, so (void *) could better
indicate it is not. It is just a block of data unknown to DFL core and to
be parsed by drivers.

And why users/drivers need to care about the alignment of the parameter
block?

Thanks,
Yilun


> follows:
> 
> /**
>  * dfh_find_param() - find parameter block for the given parameter id
>  * @dfl_dev: dfl device
>  * @param_id: id of dfl parameter
>  * @pcount: destination to store size of parameter data in u64 bit words
>  *
>  * Return: pointer to start of parameter data, PTR_ERR otherwise.
>  */
> u64 *dfh_find_param(struct dfl_device *dfl_dev, int param_id, size_t
> *pcount)
> 
> Regarding byte ordering, Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst does not currently
> mention endianness. All current HW implementations of DFL are little-endian.
> I should add a statement in Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst that fields in the
> Device Feature Header are little-endian.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback,
> Matthew Gerlach
> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> > 
> > 
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-10  0:30 [PATCH v10 0/4] Enhance definition of DFH and use enhancements for UART driver matthew.gerlach
2023-01-10  0:30 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] Documentation: fpga: dfl: Add documentation for DFHv1 matthew.gerlach
2023-01-10  0:30 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] fpga: dfl: Add DFHv1 Register Definitions matthew.gerlach
2023-01-10  0:30 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support for DFHv1 matthew.gerlach
2023-01-10 10:21   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-10 22:07     ` matthew.gerlach
2023-01-11  2:13       ` Xu Yilun [this message]
2023-01-12 10:27         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-12 15:36           ` matthew.gerlach
2023-01-13  2:22             ` Xu Yilun
2023-01-13 19:05               ` matthew.gerlach
2023-01-12 15:30         ` matthew.gerlach
2023-01-10  0:30 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] tty: serial: 8250: add DFL bus driver for Altera 16550 matthew.gerlach
2023-01-10 10:32   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-10 22:17     ` matthew.gerlach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y74bSzUBLYH4cLDh@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050 \
    --to=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=marpagan@redhat.com \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
    --cc=tianfei.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.