All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] vfs: introduce new file range exchange ioctl
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 01:44:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGUlavtPLH5tZFT/@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161723933214.3149451.12102627412985512284.stgit@magnolia>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 06:08:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

> +	ret = vfs_xchg_file_range(file1.file, file2, &args);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto fdput;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The VFS will set RANGE_FSYNC on its own if the file or inode require
> +	 * synchronous writes.  Don't leak this back to userspace.
> +	 */
> +	args.flags &= ~FILE_XCHG_RANGE_FSYNC;
> +	args.flags |= (old_flags & FILE_XCHG_RANGE_FSYNC);
> +
> +	if (copy_to_user(argp, &args, sizeof(args)))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;

Erm...  How is userland supposed to figure out whether that EFAULT
came before or after the operation?  Which of the fields are outputs,
anyway?

> +	/* Don't touch certain kinds of inodes */
> +	if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode1) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode2))
> +		return -EPERM;

Append-only should get the same treatment (and IMO if you have
O_APPEND on either file, you should get a failure as well).

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01  1:08 [PATCHSET RFC v3 00/18] xfs: atomic file updates Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:08 ` [PATCH 01/18] vfs: introduce new file range exchange ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:44   ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-04-01 21:18     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  3:32   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-04-02  0:37     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:08 ` [PATCH 02/18] xfs: support two inodes in the defer capture structure Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-02 23:20   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 03/18] xfs: allow setting and clearing of log incompat feature flags Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-02 23:20   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 04/18] xfs: clear log incompat feature bits when the log is idle Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-02 23:20   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 05/18] xfs: create a log incompat flag for atomic extent swapping Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-02 23:21   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 06/18] xfs: introduce a swap-extent log intent item Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-05 23:08   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 07/18] xfs: create deferred log items for extent swapping Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 08/18] xfs: add a ->xchg_file_range handler Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 09/18] xfs: add error injection to test swapext recovery Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 10/18] xfs: port xfs_swap_extents_rmap to our new code Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 11/18] xfs: consolidate all of the xfs_swap_extent_forks code Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 12/18] xfs: refactor reflink flag handling in xfs_swap_extent_forks Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:09 ` [PATCH 13/18] xfs: allow xfs_swap_range to use older extent swap algorithms Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:10 ` [PATCH 14/18] xfs: remove old swap extents implementation Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:10 ` [PATCH 15/18] xfs: condense extended attributes after an atomic swap Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:10 ` [PATCH 16/18] xfs: condense directories " Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:10 ` [PATCH 17/18] xfs: make atomic extent swapping support realtime files Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  1:10 ` [PATCH 18/18] xfs: enable atomic swapext feature Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-01  3:56 ` [PATCHSET RFC v3 00/18] xfs: atomic file updates Amir Goldstein
2021-04-02  0:22   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGUlavtPLH5tZFT/@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.