All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:27:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHBITqlAfOk8IV5w@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409111254.271800-1-omosnace@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 01:12:52PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> This series attempts to clean up part of the mess that has grown around
> the LSM mount option handling across different subsystems.

I would not describe growing another FS_... flag *AND* spreading the
FS_BINARY_MOUNTDATA further, with rather weird semantics at that,
as a cleanup of any sort.

I still very much dislike that approach.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09 11:12 [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs,LSM: introduce the FS_HANDLES_LSM_OPTS flag Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] selinux: fix SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS flag handling on double mount Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 12:27 ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-04-09 17:39   ` [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-05-17 13:46     ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 17:00 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-04-09 17:43   ` Ondrej Mosnacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHBITqlAfOk8IV5w@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.